ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2021
Mortality Risk from
Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- The use of race and ethnicity in air pollution epidemiology and methodological recommendations: A scoping review focusing on California.Environmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2026Review
- Spatial resolution of exposure to particulate matter (PM2.5) and the impact on the burden of disease in Germany.European journal of public health · 2026Article
- Methodological Design Choices Can Affect Air Pollution Exposure Disparity Estimates: A Case Study on California's Agricultural Sector.Environmental science & technology · 2026Article
- Modeling Traffic-Related Air Pollution Burden of Disease using High Spatial Resolution Data.Journal of transport & health · 2025Article
- Human Health Impacts of Energy Transitions across the United States among Sociodemographic Subpopulations for the Year 2050.Environmental science & technology · 2025Article
- Social-Environmental Burden Is Associated with Increased Colorectal Cancer Mortality in Metropolitan Detroit.Cancer research communications · 2025Article
- Increased Stillbirth Rates and Exposure to Environmental Risk Factors for Stillbirth in Counties with Higher Social Vulnerability: United States, 2015-2018.Maternal and child health journal · 2024Article
- The association of short-term increases in ambient PM2.5 and temperature exposures with stillbirth: racial/ethnic disparities among Medicaid recipients.American journal of epidemiology · 2024Article
- PMScience advances · 2024Article
- Joint effects of air pollution and neighborhood socioeconomic status on cognitive decline - Mediation by depression, high cholesterol levels, and high blood pressure.The Science of the total environment · 2024Article
- Increasing Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Ambient Air Pollution-Attributable Morbidity and Mortality in the United States.Environmental health perspectives · 2024Article
- All-Cause NOEnvironmental science & technology letters · 2023Article
- Racial/ethnic disparities in PMNature human behaviour · 2023Article
- State-of-the-Science Data and Methods Need to Guide Place-Based Efforts to Reduce Air Pollution Inequity.Environmental health perspectives · 2023Article
- Inequality in the Distribution of Air Pollution Attributable Mortality Within Canadian Cities.GeoHealth · 2023Article
- Sociodemographic Disparities in Mercury Exposure from United States Coal-Fired Power Plants.Environmental science & technology letters · 2023Article
- Nuclear power generation phase-outs redistribute US air quality and climate-related mortality risk.Nature energy · 2023Article
- Evaluating Race in Air Pollution and Health Research: Race, PMCurrent environmental health reports · 2023Review
- Inequitable Exposures to U.S. Coal Power Plant-RelatedEnvironmental health perspectives · 2023Article
- The One-Two-Three Punch: Exposure, Susceptibility, and Disease Burden among U.S. Populations of Color.Environmental health perspectives · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRegulatory analyses of air pollution policies require the use of concentration-response functions and underlying health data to estimate the mortality and morbidity effects, as well as the resulting benefits, associated with policy-related changes in fine particulate matter
objectivesWe aim to explore the policy implications of using race/ethnicity-specific concentration-response functions and mortality data in comparison to standard approaches when estimating the impact of air pollution on non-White racial/ethnic subgroups.
methodsUsing new estimates from the epidemiological literature on race/ethnicity-specific concentration-response functions paired with race/ethnicity-specific mortality rates, we estimated the mortality impacts of air pollution from all sources from a uniform increase in concentrations and from the regulations imposed by the Mercury Air Toxics Standards.
resultsUse of race/ethnicity-specific information increased DISCUSSION: Policy analyses incorporating race/ethnicity-specific concentration-response functions and mortality data relative to nondifferentiated inputs underestimate the overall magnitude of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.