ArticleMedical mycology2021
Implementation of a clinical decision rule for selecting empiric treatment for invasive aspergillosis in a setting with high triazole resistance.
Article in Medical mycology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Superiority Trials in Invasive Aspergillosis: A Harsh Reality Check With the IA-DUET (HOVON502) Trial.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
World-wide, emerging triazole resistance increasingly complicates treatment of invasive aspergillosis (IA). In settings with substantial (>10%) prevalence of triazole resistance, empiric combination therapy with both a triazole and liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) can be considered because of the low yields of susceptibility testing. To avoid toxicity while optimizing outcome, a strategy with monotherapy would be preferable. A newly designed treatment algorithm based on literature and expert consensus provided guidance for empiric monotherapy with either voriconazole or LAmB. Over a four and a half year period, all adult patients in our hospital treated for IA were included and patient data were collected. An independent committee reviewed the attributability of death to IA for each patient. Primary outcomes were 30- and 100-day crude mortality and attributable mortality. In total, 110 patients were treated according to the treatment algorithm. Fifty-six patients (51%) were initially treated with voriconazole and 54 patients (49%) with LAmB. Combined attributable and contributable mortality was 13% within 30 days and 20% within 100 days. Treatment switch to LAmB was made in 24/56 (43%) of patients who were initially treated with voriconazole. Combined contributable and attributable 100-day mortality in this subgroup was 21% and was not increased when compared with patients initially treated with LAmB (P = 0.38). By applying a comprehensive clinical decision algorithm, an antifungal-sparing regime was successfully introduced. Further research is warranted to explore antifungal treatment strategies that account for triazole-resistance. LAY SUMMARY: Due to resistance of Aspergillus against triazoles, combination therapy with liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) is applied more often as primary therapy against invasive aspergillosis. This study presents the results of a decision tool which differentiated between triazole or LAmB monotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.