Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34878037›Full record

Observational studyRevista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo2021

A phase IV, prospective, observational study of the clinical safety of snake antivenoms.

Denise Christie Souto Nogueira, Iara Pinheiro Calil, Roberta Márcia Marques Dos Santos, Adebal de Andrade Filho, Gláucia Cota

Open access · diamondAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Denise Christie Souto NogueiraFundação Ezequiel Dias, Divisão de Produção Farmacêutica, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8094-3935
Iara Pinheiro CalilFundação Oswaldo Cruz, Instituto René Rachou, Departamento de Pesquisa Clínica e Políticas Públicas de Doenças Infecto-Parasitárias, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7208-4632
Roberta Márcia Marques Dos SantosFundação Ezequiel Dias, Divisão de Desenvolvimento de Medicamentos, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1844-6628
Adebal de Andrade FilhoFundação Hospitalar do Estado de Minas Gerais, Hospital João XXIII, Centro de Toxicologia, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0513-8477
Gláucia CotaFundação Oswaldo Cruz, Instituto René Rachou, Departamento de Pesquisa Clínica e Políticas Públicas de Doenças Infecto-Parasitárias, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0538-7403
Ezequiel Dias Foundation · BRFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRFundação Hospitalar do Estado de Minas Gerais · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Snake envenoming is a neglected tropical disease that affects more than 2.7 million people worldwide. The treatment is based on the administration of antivenom composed of heterologous immunoglobulins, species-specific therapy involving the possibility of adverse reactions due to activation of the immune system. Considering the scarcity of prospective studies evaluating the safety of snake antivenoms, this study aimed to describe and characterize adverse events after antivenom infusion in an observational, prospective, single-centre investigation conducted in a referral centre in Brazil. A total of 47 victims of snake envenoming were included in the study, who were mostly men (75%), with ages ranging from 2 to 83 years. Twenty-two participants (47%) presented manifestations compatible with infusion-related reactions (IRRs) during or up to two hours after F(ab')2 heterologous immunoglobulin infusion. The most common clinical manifestation related to the infusion was a diffuse cutaneous rash (82%), followed by respiratory manifestations (46%) and facial swelling (23%). In four cases (9%), IRR were considered serious adverse events (SAE), characterized by haemodynamic instability, airway obstruction or hypoxia. Only one patient developed symptoms compatible with serum sickness. Although almost half of the patients treated with antivenom sera experienced IRRs, the SAE rate was 9%; in all cases, the adverse reaction was reversible by using supportive treatment, and there were no deaths. The results have shown that there is much to improve in the antivenom production process to obtain a more purified and specific product. Even so, a timely antivenom serum administration managed by well-trained health teams is safe and prevents complications after snake-related accidents.

Indexed as

AntiveninsSnake BitesAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnimalsChildChild, PreschoolHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSnakesSnake VenomsYoung AdultAntiveninsSnake Venoms

Identifiers

PMID34878037
PMCPMC8660026
OpenAlexW4205293130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.