ReviewAmerican journal of men's health
Engaging Young Black Males in Sexual and Reproductive Health Care: A Review of the Literature.
Review in American journal of men's health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Sexual Behaviors and Reproductive Responsibility Among Young Black Men at an HBCU: A Qualitative Study.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Implementation of Trauma-Informed Care into Clinical HIV Prevention and Care Settings: A Decade of Limited Progress.Current HIV/AIDS reports · 2025Review
- Real Talk: Conversations on HIV with Black Heterosexual Men in Healthcare Settings.Journal of community health · 2025Article
- Exploring the Use of Customized Links to Improve Electronic Engagement With Sexual and Reproductive Health Care Among Young African American Male Individuals: Web-Based Survey Study.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Article
- Scoping review of sexual and reproductive healthcare for men in the MENA (Middle East and North Africa) region: a handful of paradoxes?BMC public health · 2023Article
- Sexual and reproductive health and rights of "last mile" adolescents: a scoping review.Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2022Article
- Go the Distance: Reproductive Health Care for People with Sickle Cell Disease.Hematology/oncology clinics of North America · 2022Review
- Men's Access to Medical and Preventive Care in Almaty: A Cross-Sectional Study by Occupation.American journal of men's healthArticle
- How to Engage Men in Preconception Health?: A Scoping Review.Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery researchArticle
- Enhancing Male Participation in Reproductive Health care in the Philippines: A Multisectoral Approach.American journal of men's healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Young Black males (YBM) ages 18 to 24 years are more at risk of contracting sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and have a substantially greater need for sexual reproductive health (SRH) services than other groups. Despite this significant need, the extant literature does not provide a comprehensive picture of how YBM seek preventive care services (e.g., STI testing). Therefore, the purpose of this review is to address YBM's SRH access and use of STI/HIV testing and screening in this population, with a specific emphasis on young heterosexual Black males, by identifying barriers and facilitators of engaging with SRH care. An electronic search was performed using Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PsycInfo, PubMed, and Scopus online databases. Keywords were adapted to each database and included variations of "Black males," "sexual reproductive healthcare services," "youth (18-24 years old)," and "healthcare access and utilization." Studies from the review reported that barriers to engaging in SRH care included lack of health insurance, ideas of masculinity that conflict with SRH care, stigma related to accessing services, and lack of knowledge regarding available services and care options. The top facilitators for utilizing SRH care were engagement on behalf of health clinics, confidence gained from social support, access to quality health care in one's community, and trust in the health care system and providers. This review contributes to the current state of the science and is important to the improvement of high-quality services for this population, including respect, choice in care, confidentially, and compassion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.