Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34877802›Full record

ArticlePhysiological reports2021

Exercise adherence-related perceptual responses to low-load blood flow restriction resistance exercise in young adults: A pilot study.

Tadashi Suga, Kento Dora, Ernest Mok, Takeshi Sugimoto, Keigo Tomoo, Shingo Takada, Takeshi Hashimoto, Tadao Isaka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Hemodynamic analysis of blood flow restriction training: a systematic review.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tadashi SugaFaculty of Sport and Health Science, Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0313-9660
Kento DoraFaculty of Sport and Health Science, Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan.
Ernest MokFaculty of Sport and Health Science, Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan.
Takeshi SugimotoFaculty of Sport and Health Science, Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan.
Keigo TomooFaculty of Sport and Health Science, Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan.
Shingo TakadaFaculty of Lifelong Sport, Department of Sports Education, Hokusho University, Ebetsu, Hokkaido, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7781-9482
Takeshi HashimotoFaculty of Sport and Health Science, Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan.
Tadao IsakaFaculty of Sport and Health Science, Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resistance exercise (RE) with blood flow restriction (BFR) is recognized as a beneficial strategy in increasing skeletal muscle mass and strength. However, the effects of BFR on changes in perceptual parameters, particularly those related to exercise adherence, induced by RE are not completely understood. In this study, we examined the exercise adherence-related perceptual responses to low-load BFR-RE. Sixteen young males performed both BFR and non-BFR (NBFR) sessions in a crossover design. The bilateral knee extensor low-load RE was performed with a standard BFR-RE protocol, consisting of four sets (total 75 repetitions), using 20% of one-repetition maximum. BFR-RE was performed with 200 mmHg pressure cuffs placed around the proximal region of the thighs. NBFR-RE was performed without pressure cuffs. The ratings of perceived exertion and leg discomfort measured using the Borg's Scales were higher for BFR-RE session than for NBFR-RE session (both p < 0.001 for interaction effect). The Feeling Scale-measured affect and Task Motivation Scale-measured task motivation were lower for BFR-RE session than for NBFR-RE session (both p < 0.05 for interaction effect); by contrast, the Numerical Rating Scale-measured perceived pain was higher for BFR-RE session than for NBFR-RE session (p < 0.001 for interaction effect). The Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale-measured enjoyment immediately after RE was lower with BFR than with NBFR (p < 0.001). These findings suggest that BFR exacerbates the exercise adherence-related perceptual responses to low-load RE in young males. Therefore, further studies are needed to develop effective strategies that minimize the BFR-RE-induced negative effects on perceptual responses.

Indexed as

Resistance TrainingAffectBacterial ProteinsBlood GlucoseCross-Over StudiesElectromyographyExerciseHeart RateHumansLactic AcidMaleMembrane ProteinsMuscle, SkeletalPilot ProjectsRegional Blood FlowThighBacterial ProteinsBlood GlucoseLactic AcidMembrane ProteinsMotX protein, bacteriaaffectenjoymentperceived exertiontask motivation

Identifiers

PMID34877802
PMCPMC8652406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.