Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34877718›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2022

Groupitizing modifies neural coding of numerosity.

Paula A Maldonado Moscoso, Mark W Greenlee, Giovanni Anobile, Roberto Arrighi, David C Burr, Elisa Castaldi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Feature-selective adaptation of numerosity perception.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. "Groupitizing": A Visuo-Spatial and Arithmetic Phenomenon.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Paula A Maldonado MoscosoDepartment of Neuroscience, Psychology, Pharmacology and Child Health, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9599-1246
Mark W GreenleeInstitut für Psychologie, Universität Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2305-9286
Giovanni AnobileDepartment of Neuroscience, Psychology, Pharmacology and Child Health, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2796-0661
Roberto ArrighiDepartment of Neuroscience, Psychology, Pharmacology and Child Health, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5435-6729
David C BurrDepartment of Neuroscience, Psychology, Pharmacology and Child Health, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1541-8832
Elisa CastaldiDepartment of Neuroscience, Psychology, Pharmacology and Child Health, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0327-6697

Funding

European Research Council 832813Marie Curie 885672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerical estimation of arrays of objects is faster and more accurate when items can be clustered into groups, a phenomenon termed "groupitizing." Grouping can facilitate segregation into subitizable "chunks," each easily estimated, then summed. The current study investigates whether spatial grouping of arrays drives specific neural responses during numerical estimation, reflecting strategies such as exact calculation and fact retrieval. Fourteen adults were scanned with fMRI while estimating either the numerosity or shape of arrays of items, either randomly distributed or spatially grouped. Numerosity estimation of both classes of stimuli elicited common activation of a right lateralized frontoparietal network. Grouped stimuli additionally recruited regions in the left hemisphere and bilaterally in the angular gyrus. Multivariate pattern analysis showed that classifiers trained with the pattern of neural activations read out from parietal regions, but not from the primary visual areas, can decode different numerosities both within and across spatial arrangements. The behavioral numerical acuity correlated with the decoding performance of the parietal but not with occipital regions. Overall, this experiment suggests that the estimation of grouped stimuli relies on the approximate number system for numerosity estimation, but additionally recruits regions involved in calculation.

Indexed as

Brain MappingMathematical ConceptsAdultCerebral CortexFemaleHumansJudgmentMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePattern Recognition, VisualSpace PerceptionYoung Adultangular gyrusapproximate number system (ANS)calculationgroupitizingnumerosity perception

Identifiers

PMID34877718
PMCPMC8764479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.