ArticleActa neurologica Scandinavica2022
Treatment outcomes in women with idiopathic generalized epilepsy.
Article in Acta neurologica Scandinavica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Women With Genetic Epilepsies.Neurology. Genetics · 2025Review
- Treatment outcomes in women with idiopathic generalized epilepsy.Acta neurologica Scandinavica · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the changes in prescription patterns in the treatment of idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE) due to updated treatment recommendations and to assess seizure outcomes of valproate compared to other antiseizure medications (ASMs), with emphasis on women with epilepsy (WWE). MATERIALS AND
methodsRecords of IGE patients treated at Tampere University Hospital between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2018 were retrospectively inspected. Data were analysed for two subgroups based on age and sex. Seizure control with reference to the efficacy of different ASMs and their combinations was examined for each subgroup.
resultsThe study compiled 263 subjects (166 females and 97 males). Of all patients, 72.6% remained seizure free. There was no difference in seizure control between sexes (OR 1.25, p = .48). Males used valproate more often than females while females used lamotrigine and levetiracetam more often than males. Lamotrigine and levetiracetam were used especially as monotherapy in WWE, and mostly as part of combination therapy in males. Valproate alternatives were found as effective as valproate when used in monotherapy in adults. Valproate remained the most used ASM in the paediatric subgroup.
conclusionsThe use of valproate has decreased in daily clinical use with the simultaneous increased use of alternative ASMs compared to our previous study. Decreasing use of valproate in WWE did not increase the risk of seizure recurrence; therefore, valproate alternatives could be considered as first-line ASMs for WWE. Overall, IGE patients demonstrated good clinical outcomes with valproate or other broad-spectrum ASMs as monotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.