Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34877624›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutical medicine2021

Effectiveness of Additional Risk Minimization Measures for Atezolizumab in the European Union.

Hina Patel, Thanh G N Ton, Jessica Davies, Simon Fear, Carolin Block, Kunihiko Tanaka, Danny Gonzalez, Roger Mutter, Noelia Alfaro-Oliver, Ignacio Mendez and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 84% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hina PatelGenentech, 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA. patelhina14@yahoo.com.
Thanh G N TonGenentech, 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA.
Jessica DaviesRoche Products Ltd., Welwyn Garden City, UK.
Simon FearHoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland.
Carolin BlockHoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland.
Kunihiko TanakaGenentech, 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA.
Danny GonzalezGenentech, 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA.
Roger MutterHoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland.
Noelia Alfaro-OliverOXON Epidemiology, Madrid, Spain.
Ignacio MendezOXON Epidemiology, Madrid, Spain.
Nawab QizilbashOXON Epidemiology, Madrid, Spain.
Roche (Switzerland) · CHLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBRoche (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA Guide for Healthcare Professionals (HCP Guide) and patient alert card (PAC) for atezolizumab as additional risk minimization measures for physicians were distributed to raise awareness and help in the detection and management of immune-related adverse drug reactions.

objectivesThe main objective of this study was to assess the receipt, knowledge, and behaviors of physicians regarding the atezolizumab HCP Guide and PAC.

methodsA multi-country, one-wave, observational, cross-sectional, web-based, self-reported physician survey was conducted to assess the level of knowledge of key messages related to immune-related adverse drug reactions summarized in the atezolizumab HCP Guide and PAC among physicians (oncologists, pulmonologists, and urologists) prescribing atezolizumab in six European countries (Denmark, Germany, Italy, Spain, Sweden, and the UK). Responses regarding the receipt, understanding and use of the materials, and knowledge and behavior related to the HCP Guide and PAC are presented as percentages and continuous scores scaled out of 100 points, with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

resultsAmong 313 physicians (255 oncologists, 30 pulmonologists, and 28 urologists), 77.4% received the HCP Guide and 74.2% the PAC. The HCP Guide was read by 71.3% of the 267 physicians who received the materials, and the mean usage score was 69.5 (95% CI 66.0-72.9), and 57.1% of physicians had scores ≥ 70. The HCP Guide was completely understood by 85.4% of physicians who had read it. Mean knowledge scores were 63.9 (95% CI 62.1-65.7) and 39.4% of physicians had correct knowledge scores ≥ 70. Mean knowledge scores were 66.8 (95% CI 64.9-68.7) for receipt of both the HCP Guide and PAC, 59.4 (95% CI 55.5-63.4) for one of the materials, and 60.8 (95% CI 55.4-66.2) for having received none of the materials. Mean behavior scores were 78.9 (95% CI 76.8-81.0), and 74.8% of physicians had behavior scores ≥ 70. The mean behavior score was 79.0 (95% CI 76.5-81.5) for those who received both the HCP Guide and PAC, 76.9 (95% CI 72.2-81.5) for receipt of one of the materials, and 81.5 (95% CI 75.0-88.0) for those who received none of the materials.

conclusionsThe study assessed the effectiveness of the atezolizumab additional risk minimization educational materials among physicians in six European countries, using process indicators. The educational materials reached over 70% of target physicians, 57.1% of whom reported using them. Knowledge and behavior related to immune-related adverse drug reactions for atezolizumab were no better in those who received the additional risk minimization educational materials. The results support the safe use of atezolizumab by these physician groups and contributed to the European Medicines Agency permitting removal of the HCP Guide.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedHealth PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesEuropean UnionHumansAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanizedatezolizumab

Identifiers

PMID34877624
PMCPMC8668858
OpenAlexW4200573967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.