ReviewGlobal medical genetics2021
DNA Profiling in Forensic Science: A Review.
Review in Global medical genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.
- Atypical short tandem repeat allelic patterns in a sexual assault case involving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.Journal of forensic sciences · 2026Article
- Teeth as forensic evidence for SRY gene-based gender determination: a scoping review.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Advanced molecular techniques in distinguishing monozygotic twins for forensic applications.Genes & genomics · 2026Review
- Optimized Method for Efficient DNA Extraction from Agricultural Soils.Methods and protocols · 2026Article
- Predicting Physical Appearance from Low Template: State of the Art and Future Perspectives.Genes · 2026Review
- Analysis of Forensic and Drowning Death Studies Using VOSviewer: A Bibliometric Study.Acta medica Philippina · 2026Article
- Evaluate the forensic efficiency parameters of the D13S317 gene in closely related family members in Gondar town, Northwest Ethiopia.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2025Article
- Genetic/epigenetic DNA markers for linking suspects and tissues in complex crime scenes.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Impact of liquid antibacterial soap and hand sanitizer on DNA transfer in forensic investigations: an experimental study.Forensic sciences research · 2025Article
- Microbial genomics: a potential toolkit for forensic investigations.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2025Review
- De Novo Green Fluorescent Protein Chromophore-Based Probes for Capturing Latent Fingerprints Using a Portable System.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2024Article
- Review
- Forensic biogeographical ancestry inference: recent insights and current trends.Genes & genomics · 2023Review
- Development of a rapid, in-situ analysis method using sheath-flow probe electrospray ionisation-mass spectrometry for the direct identification of cocaine metabolites in dried blood spots.Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM · 2023Article
- Quantification of DNA, in dried blood, saliva tinged with blood in comparision with fresh blood for forensic identification- A pilot study.Journal of oral and maxillofacial pathology : JOMFPArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
DNA is present in most of the cells in our body, which is unique in each and every individual, and we leave a trail of it everywhere we go. This has become an advantage for forensic investigators who use DNA to draw conclusion in identification of victim and accused in crime scenes. This review described the use of genetic markers in forensic investigation and their limitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.