Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34877550›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology open science2022

Graft Plus Fasciocutaneous Penile Flap for Nearly or Completely Obliterated Long Bulbar and Penobulbar Strictures.

Pankaj M Joshi, Marco Bandini, Sandeep Bafna, Vipin Sharma, Amey Patil, Shreyas Bhadranavar, Christian Yepes, Guido Barbagli, Francesco Montorsi, Sanjay B Kulkarni

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology open science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Pankaj M JoshiKulkarni Reconstructive Urology Center, Pune, India.
Marco BandiniKulkarni Reconstructive Urology Center, Pune, India.
Sandeep BafnaKulkarni Reconstructive Urology Center, Pune, India.
Vipin SharmaKulkarni Reconstructive Urology Center, Pune, India.
Amey PatilKulkarni Reconstructive Urology Center, Pune, India.
Shreyas BhadranavarKulkarni Reconstructive Urology Center, Pune, India.
Christian YepesKulkarni Reconstructive Urology Center, Pune, India.
Guido BarbagliCentro Chirurgico Toscano, Arezzo, Italy.
Francesco MontorsiUnit of Urology, Urological Research Institute (URI), San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Sanjay B KulkarniKulkarni Reconstructive Urology Center, Pune, India.
Kulkarni reconstructive Urology Center · INVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGraft plus flap urethroplasty is gaining momentum in patients with nearly or completely obliterated urethral strictures, in whom staged procedures or perineal urethrostomy is the only possible alternative. However, graft plus flap urethroplasty is mainly adopted for strictures involving the penile urethra.

objectiveTo report our experience on graft plus flap urethroplasty for bulbar and penobulbar reconstruction. DESIGN SETTING AND

participantsBetween January 2014 and June 2020, patients with nearly or completely obliterated long (>4 cm) bulbar or penobulbar strictures, who required graft plus flap urethroplasty, were considered for this study. SURGICAL PROCEDURE: The bulbar and the penile urethra were accessed through a perineal incision and penile invagination when required. Grafts were harvested from cheek, lingual, or preputial skin and quilted over the corpora to reconstruct the dorsal plate of the neourethra. The fasciocutaneous penile flap recreated the ventral plate of the neourethra. The corpus spongiosum was flapped over the neourethra to prevent the formation of diverticula. MEASUREMENTS: Any need for instrumentation after surgery was defined as the primary failure. Obstructive symptoms or maximum flow rate (Qmax) below 10 ml/s, with or without a need for instrumentation, was defined as a secondary failure. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: We identified 15 patients who met the inclusion criteria. The median stricture length was 7 cm (interquartile range [IQR] 5-8 cm). The inner cheek was the preferred site for graft harvesting (53.3%). No perioperative complication of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III were recorded in the first 30 postoperative days. The median Qmax at catheter removal was 23 ml/min (IQR 21.5-26 ml/min). The median follow-up was 25 mo (IQR 10-30 mo). The primary success rate was 86.7% (13/15) and the secondary success rate was 73.3% (11/15). Post-traumatic strictures represent a contraindication for this technique.

conclusionsIn referral centers, graft plus flap urethroplasty represents a feasible option for patients with nearly or completely obliterated long (>4 cm) strictures. Our study demonstrated that this option is also feasible for strictures involving mainly the bulbar urethra. PATIENT SUMMARY: Perineal urethrostomy should be considered as the last option in patients with a nearly or completely obliterated bulbar urethral stricture. Nowadays, graft plus fasciocutaneous penile flap augmentation enriched our armamentarium of bulbar urethra reconstruction.

Indexed as

Buccal mucosa graftBulbar strictureFasciocutaneous penile flapReconstructive urologyUrethroplasty

Identifiers

PMID34877550
PMCPMC8633879
OpenAlexW3217611911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.