Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34877322›Full record

Trial reportWorld journal of clinical cases2021

Evaluating the efficacy of endoscopic sphincterotomy on biliary-type sphincter of Oddi dysfunction: A retrospective clinical trial.

Li-Kun Ren, Zhi-Yuan Cai, Xun Ran, Neng-Hong Yang, Xing-Zhi Li, Hao Liu, Chang-Wei Wu, Wen-Ying Zeng, Min Han

Open access · diamondAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in World journal of clinical cases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Li-Kun RenDepartment of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang 550025, Guizhou Province, China.
Zhi-Yuan CaiDepartment of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang 550025, Guizhou Province, China.
Xun RanDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550000, Guizhou Province, China.
Neng-Hong YangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550000, Guizhou Province, China.
Xing-Zhi LiDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550000, Guizhou Province, China.
Hao LiuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550000, Guizhou Province, China.
Chang-Wei WuDepartment of General Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Bijie City, Bijie 551700, Guizhou Province, China.
Wen-Ying ZengDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550000, Guizhou Province, China.
Min HanDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550000, Guizhou Province, China. 409582096@qq.com.
Guiyang Medical University · CNAffiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University · CNIE University · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) has a positive therapeutic effect on biliary-type sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD), some patients still have little relief after EST, which implies that other functional abdominal pain may also be present with biliary-type SOD and interfere with the diagnosis and treatment of it.

aimTo retrospectively assess EST as a treatment for biliary-type SOD and analyze the importance of functional gastrointestinal disorder (FGID) in guiding endoscopic treatment of SOD.

methodsClinical data of 79 patients with biliary-type SOD (type I and type II) treated with EST at Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University from January 2014 to January 2019 were retrospectively collected to evaluate the clinical therapeutic effect of EST. The significance of relationship between FGID and biliary-type SOD was analyzed.

resultsSeventy-nine patients with biliary-type SOD received EST, including 29 type 1 patients and 50 type 2 patients. The verbal rating scale-5 (VRS-5) scores before EST were all 3 or 4 points, and the scores decreased after EST; the difference was statistically significant (

conclusionEST is a safe and effective treatment for SOD. For patients with type I and II SOD combined with FGID, single EST or medical treatment has limited efficacy. It is recommended that EST and medicine be combined to improve the cure rate of such patients.

Indexed as

Curative effectEndoscopic sphincterotomyFunctional dyspepsiaFunctional gastrointestinal disordersFunctional heartburnIrritable bowel syndromeSphincter of Oddi dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID34877322
PMCPMC8610902
OpenAlexW3213236923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.