Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34877037›Full record

ArticleSurgical neurology international2021

Meningiomas in dogs.

Vladimír Beneš, Martina Margoldová, Ondřej Bradáč, Petr Skalický, Dominik Vlach

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical neurology international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 76% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vladimír BenešDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, Military University Hospital and First Faculty of Medicine Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Martina MargoldováDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, VetPark Clinic, Brandys nad Labem, Czech Republic.
Ondřej BradáčDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, Military University Hospital and First Faculty of Medicine Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Petr SkalickýDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, Military University Hospital and First Faculty of Medicine Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Dominik VlachDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, VetPark Clinic, Brandys nad Labem, Czech Republic.
Military University Hospital Prague · CZCharles University · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMeningiomas and gliomas are the two most common types of human intracranial tumors. However, meningiomas are not exclusively human tumors and are often seen in dogs and cats.

methodsTo present meningioma surgery in dogs and compare the surgical possibilities, tumor location, and to show the differences between human and veterinary approaches to tumor profiling. Eleven dogs with meningiomas were treated surgically for 5 years. All tumors except one were resected radically (Simpson 2). Localization of tumors mirrored that of human meningiomas.

resultsTwo dogs died in direct relation to surgery. One died 14 months after surgery due to tumor regrowth. Three dogs died of unrelated causes 10-36 months after tumor resection and five dogs are alive and tumor-free 2-42 months after surgery.

conclusionRadical surgery in dogs is as effective as in humans. Thus, we propose that it should be implemented as first-line treatment. The article is meant to please all those overly curious neurosurgeons in the world.

Indexed as

DogMeningiomaRadicalitySurgery

Identifiers

PMID34877037
PMCPMC8645500
OpenAlexW3213232254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.