Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34877014›Full record

ReviewObesity science & practice2021

Underestimation of overweight weight status in children and adolescents aged 0-19 years: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Abrar Alshahrani, Farag Shuweihdi, Judy Swift, Amanda Avery

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Obesity science & practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Can Adults Accurately Judge Child Weight Status?Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  9. Obstetric and Neonatal Outcomes in Overweight Adolescent Pregnant Mothers.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. African American mothers' perceptions of infant body size are prospectively associated with infant growth and BMI.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Abrar AlshahraniDivision of Nutritional Sciences University of Nottingham Nottingham UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5911-7340
Farag ShuweihdiLeeds Institute of Health Sciences Faculty of Medicine Leeds University Leeds UK.
Judy SwiftDivision of Nutritional Sciences University of Nottingham Nottingham UK.
Amanda AveryDivision of Food, Nutrition and Dietetics University of Nottingham Nottingham UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPerceptions of children's weight status may be important in obesity prevention and treatment.

aimsThis review identifies the prevalence of the underestimation of overweight status in children by parents/main carers, children, and healthcare professionals (HCP). The review critically synthesized both quantitative and qualitative evidence to explore the factors associated with this underestimation. The diverse methods used to assess this phenomenon are reported.

methodsPooled effect sizes were calculated using random-effects model. Published studies, up to 2020, were accessed using the following search engines: CINAHL, EMBASE, PUBMED, and Psych-Info and including the "Cited by" and "Related Articles" functions. Hand-searching was used to retrieve further articles. Publication language and location had no bearing on the nature of the included studies.

resultsA total of 91 articles were included. In the quantitative studies, 55% (95% CI 49%-61%) of caregivers underestimated their child's level of overweight and obesity using a verbal scale and 47% (95% CI 36%-55%) using visual scales. Of the children studied, 34% (95% CI 25%-43%) underestimated their own level of overweight and obesity using both scales. In (

conclusionThe results confirm the prevalence of underestimation of child overweight status across international studies. Understanding the factors which lead to this inaccuracy may help to improve communication within the therapeutic triad and facilitate the recognition and management of children's overweight status.

Indexed as

childhealthcare professionalsoverweightparentsunderestimation and perceptionsweight

Identifiers

PMID34877014
PMCPMC8633945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.