Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34876785›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2021

Serologic diagnosis of celiac disease: May it be suitable for adults?

Giuseppe Losurdo, Milena Di Leo, Edoardo Santamato, Monica Arena, Maria Rendina, Carmelo Luigiano, Enzo Ierardi, Alfredo Di Leo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Giuseppe LosurdoSection of Gastroenterology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari 70124, Italy. giuseppelos@alice.it.
Milena Di LeoUnit of Digestive Endoscopy, San Paolo Hospital, Milan 20090, Italy.
Edoardo SantamatoSection of Gastroenterology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari 70124, Italy.
Monica ArenaUnit of Digestive Endoscopy, San Paolo Hospital, Milan 20090, Italy.
Maria RendinaSection of Gastroenterology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari 70124, Italy.
Carmelo LuigianoUnit of Digestive Endoscopy, San Paolo Hospital, Milan 20090, Italy.
Enzo IerardiSection of Gastroenterology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari 70124, Italy.
Alfredo Di LeoSection of Gastroenterology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari 70124, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diagnosis of coeliac disease (CD) in adult patients requires the simultaneous assessment of clinical presentation, serology, and typical histological picture of villous atrophy. However, several years ago, the European Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition guidelines approved new criteria for the diagnosis in children: Biopsy could be avoided when anti-transglutaminase antibody (TGA) values exceed the cut-off of × 10 upper limit of normal (ULN) and anti-endomysium antibodies are positive, independently from value. This "no biopsy" approach is a decisive need for pediatric population, allowing to avoid stressful endoscopic procedures in children, if unnecessary. This approach relies on the correlation existing in children between TGA levels and assessment of mucosal atrophy according to Marsh's classification. Several lines of evidence have shown that patients with villous atrophy have markedly elevated TGA levels. Therefore, we aim to perform a narrative review on the topic in adults. Despite that some studies confirmed that the × 10 ULN threshold value has a very good diagnostic performance, several lines of evidence in adults suggest that TGA cut off should be different from that of pediatric population for reaching a good correlation with histological picture. In conclusion, the heterogeneity of study reports as well as some conditions, which may hamper the serological diagnosis of CD (such as seronegative CD and non-celiac villous atrophy) and are much more common in adults than in children, could represent a limitation for the "no biopsy" approach to CD diagnosis in patients outside the pediatric age.

Indexed as

Celiac DiseaseAdultAtrophyAutoantibodiesBiopsyChildHumansImmunoglobulin ATransglutaminasesAutoantibodiesImmunoglobulin ATransglutaminasesAnti-transglutaminase antibodyBiopsyCeliac diseaseSerologyVillous atrophy

Identifiers

PMID34876785
PMCPMC8611199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.