ArticleScientific reports2021
Quantum deep reinforcement learning for clinical decision support in oncology: application to adaptive radiotherapy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient-Specific Deep Reinforcement Learning for Proton Beam Delivery Under Inter-Phase Variations.International journal of particle therapy · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Particle Therapy Treatment Planning: Current Advances and Future Directions.International journal of particle therapy · 2026Article
- Generative AI, foundation models and large language models in radiation therapy physics: Clinical applications, challenges, and future directions.Medical physics · 2026Review
- Quantum Machine Learning for Biomedical Classification Problems: A Feasibility Study on Real Quantum Hardware.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Lung Cancer: From Early Detection to Personalized Therapy.Current oncology reports · 2026Review
- Quantum-machine-assisted drug discovery.npj drug discovery · 2026Review
- The Role of PET Image Quantification in Modern Radiation Therapy.PET clinics · 2025Review
- Quantum Oncology: The Applications of Quantum Computing in Cancer Research.Journal of medical systems · 2025Review
- A systematic review of quantum machine learning for digital health.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Intricacies of human-AI interaction in dynamic decision-making for precision oncology.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Coalition of explainable artificial intelligence and quantum computing in precision medicine.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Review
- Article
- Evaluating the combined efficacy of Telisotuzumab Vedotin and artificial intelligence in the treatment of non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer: a narrative review focusing on pharmaceutical and technical insights.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Quantum Computing in Medicine.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- The connection between aging, cellular senescence and gut microbiome alterations: A comprehensive review.Aging cell · 2024Review
- Concepts and applications of digital twins in healthcare and medicine.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Review
- Revolutionizing Healthcare: The Emerging Role of Quantum Computing in Enhancing Medical Technology and Treatment.Cureus · 2024Review
- Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in precision oncology: a review on enhancing discoverability through multiomics integration.The British journal of radiology · 2023Review
- Leveraging the Academic Artificial Intelligence Silecosystem to Advance the Community Oncology Enterprise.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- The Promise and Future of Radiomics for Personalized Radiotherapy Dosing and Adaptation.Seminars in radiation oncology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Subtle differences in a patient's genetics and physiology may alter radiotherapy (RT) treatment responses, motivating the need for a more personalized treatment plan. Accordingly, we have developed a novel quantum deep reinforcement learning (qDRL) framework for clinical decision support that can estimate an individual patient's dose response mid-treatment and recommend an optimal dose adjustment. Our framework considers patients' specific information including biological, physical, genetic, clinical, and dosimetric factors. Recognizing that physicians must make decisions amidst uncertainty in RT treatment outcomes, we employed indeterministic quantum states to represent human decision making in a real-life scenario. We paired quantum decision states with a model-based deep q-learning algorithm to optimize the clinical decision-making process in RT. We trained our proposed qDRL framework on an institutional dataset of 67 stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated on prospective adaptive protocols and independently validated our framework in an external multi-institutional dataset of 174 NSCLC patients. For a comprehensive evaluation, we compared three frameworks: DRL, qDRL trained in a Qiskit quantum computing simulator, and qDRL trained in an IBM quantum computer. Two metrics were considered to evaluate our framework: (1) similarity score, defined as the root mean square error between retrospective clinical decisions and the AI recommendations, and (2) self-evaluation scheme that compares retrospective clinical decisions and AI recommendations based on the improvement in the observed clinical outcomes. Our analysis shows that our framework, which takes into consideration individual patient dose response in its decision-making, can potentially improve clinical RT decision-making by at least about 10% compared to unaided clinical practice. Further validation of our novel quantitative approach in a prospective study will provide a necessary framework for improving the standard of care in personalized RT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.