Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34876595›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Patterns of livestock depredation and Human-wildlife conflict in Misgar valley of Hunza, Pakistan.

Rubina Bano, Akbar Khan, Tahir Mehmood, Saeed Abbas, Muhammad Zafar Khan, Arshad Ali Shedayi, Sher Zaman, Muhammad Ali Nawaz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rubina BanoDepartment of Biological Sciences, Karakoram International University, Gilgit, Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan.
Akbar KhanDepartment of Biological Sciences, Karakoram International University, Gilgit, Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan.
Tahir MehmoodSchool of Natural Sciences (SNS), National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), Islamabad, Pakistan.
Saeed AbbasDepartment of Biological Sciences, Karakoram International University, Gilgit, Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan.
Muhammad Zafar KhanEnvironmental Sciences, Karakoram International University, Gilgit, Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan.
Arshad Ali ShedayiDepartment of Biological Sciences, Karakoram International University, Gilgit, Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan.
Sher ZamanDepartment of Physics, Karakoram International University, Gilgit, Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan.
Muhammad Ali NawazDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar. nawazma@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Throughout the world, livestock predation by mammalian carnivores causes significant economic losses to poor farmers, and leads to human-wildlife conflicts. These conflicts result in a negative attitude towards carnivore conservation and often trigger retaliatory killing. In northern Pakistan, we investigated livestock depredation by large carnivores between 2014 and 2019, and subsequent Human-wildlife conflict, through questionnaire-based surveys (n = 100 households). We used a semi-structured questionnaire to collect data on livestock population, depredation patterns, predation count, and conservation approaches. We found a statistically significant increasing pattern of predation with influential factors such as age, gender, occupation, education of respondents, population of predators, threats index for predators and conservation efforts. Some 310 livestock heads with an average of 51 animals per year out of the total 9273 heads were killed by predators, and among them 168 (54%) were attributed to the wolf and 142 (45.8%) to snow leopard. Major threats to carnivores in the area included retaliatory killing, habitat destruction and climate change. Incentivization against depredation losses, guarded grazing and construction of predator-proof corral may reduce Human-wildlife conflict and both livelihood and predator can be safeguarded in the study area.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, WildConservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemHumansLivestockPakistanPantheraPredatory BehaviorWolves

Identifiers

PMID34876595
PMCPMC8651803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.