Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34876517›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

Computing the daily reproduction number of COVID-19 by inverting the renewal equation using a variational technique.

Luis Alvarez, Miguel Colom, Jean-David Morel, Jean-Michel Morel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. ern: AnPloS one · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Decision-making tools for healthcare structures in times of pandemic.Anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Luis AlvarezCentro de Tecnologías de la Imagen, Departamento de Informática y Sistemas, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 35017 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain; lalvarez@ulpgc.es.ORCID 0000-0002-6953-9587
Miguel ColomCentre Borelli, Université Paris-Saclay, École Normale Supérieure Paris-Saclay, CNRS, F-91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2636-0656
Jean-David MorelLaboratoire de Physiologie Intégrative et Systémique, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jean-Michel MorelCentre Borelli, Université Paris-Saclay, École Normale Supérieure Paris-Saclay, CNRS, F-91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6108-897X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has undergone frequent and rapid changes in its local and global infection rates, driven by governmental measures or the emergence of new viral variants. The reproduction number

Indexed as

Basic Reproduction NumberComputer SimulationCOVID-19ForecastingHumansIncidenceModels, TheoreticalSARS-CoV-2COVID-19integral equationsrenewal equationreproduction number

Identifiers

PMID34876517
PMCPMC8685677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.