ArticleRespiratory care2022
Improving Access and Guideline Adherence in Pulmonary Care in Patients With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.
Article in Respiratory care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unveiling the Respiratory Muscle Strength in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: The Impact of Nutrition and Thoracic Deformities, Beyond Spirometry.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- COVID-19 Mimics Pulmonary Dysfunction in Muscular Dystrophy as a Post-Acute Syndrome in Patients.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- The mobile sleep medicine model in neurologic practice: Rationale and application.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDuchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a devastating, progressive neuromuscular disease that results in cardiopulmonary failure and death. In 2018, the DMD Care Considerations guidelines were updated to improve the multidisciplinary approach to care and promote early respiratory management. We sought to evaluate the impact of a multidisciplinary clinic on access to pulmonary care and adherence to respiratory care guidelines.
methodsUtilizing retrospective data, we assessed for pulmonary care between 2016-2019 and congruence with guidelines from March 2018-February 2019. Using a standardized visit protocol, subjects were monitored for adherence to pulmonary function testing (PFT) and polysomnography (PSG) recommendations.
resultsOf the 84 subjects with DMD, only 51.2% had prior pulmonary involvement, and approximately one-third were seen in the year prior to clinic onset. Only 23% of subjects with a pulmonary referral completed this visit. After clinic initiation, the average age of a subject's first pulmonary contact decreased from 11.8 y to 7.9 y (
conclusionsDevelopment of a multispecialty clinic expanded access to pulmonary care and evaluation in subjects with DMD. Continued care in this clinic will allow a better understanding of barriers to access and the opportunity to monitor long-term pulmonary health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.