Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34876433›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Estimating the economic impacts of percutaneous coronary intervention in Australia: a registry-based cost burden study.

Peter Lee, Angela L Brennan, Dion Stub, Diem T Dinh, Jeffrey Lefkovits, Christopher M Reid, Ella Zomer, Danny Liew

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cost-utility analysis of a supervised exercise intervention for women with early-stage endometrial cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Peter LeeSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia peter.lee1@monash.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7059-1959
Angela L BrennanSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Dion StubSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Diem T DinhSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jeffrey LefkovitsSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Christopher M ReidSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Ella ZomerSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Danny LiewSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIn this study, we sought to evaluate the costs of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) across a variety of indications in Victoria, Australia, using a direct per-person approach, as well as to identify key cost drivers.

designA cost-burden study of PCI in Victoria was conducted from the Australian healthcare system perspective.

settingA linked dataset of patients admitted to public hospitals for PCI in Victoria was drawn from the Victorian Cardiac Outcomes Registry (VCOR) and the Victorian Admitted Episodes Dataset. Generalised linear regression modelling was used to evaluate key cost drivers. From 2014 to 2017, 20 345 consecutive PCIs undertaken in Victorian public hospitals were captured in VCOR. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Direct healthcare costs attributed to PCI, estimated using a casemix funding method.

resultsKey cost drivers identified in the cost model included procedural complexity, patient length of stay and vascular access site. Although the total procedural cost increased from $A55 569 740 in 2014 to $A72 179 656 in 2017, mean procedural costs remained stable over time ($A12 521 in 2014 to $A12 185 in 2017) after adjustment for confounding factors. Mean procedural costs were also stable across patient indications for PCI ($A9872 for unstable angina to $A15 930 for ST-elevation myocardial infarction) after adjustment for confounding factors.

conclusionsThe overall cost burden attributed to PCIs in Victoria is rising over time. However, despite increasing procedural complexity, mean procedural costs remained stable over time which may be, in part, attributed to changes in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Percutaneous Coronary InterventionAngina, UnstableHealth Care CostsHumansRegistriesTreatment OutcomeVictoriacardiologycoronary interventionhealth economicsmyocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID34876433
PMCPMC8655558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.