Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34876199›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2021

Development of a new score for early mortality prediction in trauma ICU patients: RETRASCORE.

Luis Serviá, Juan Antonio Llompart-Pou, Mario Chico-Fernández, Neus Montserrat, Mariona Badia, Jesús Abelardo Barea-Mendoza, María Ángeles Ballesteros-Sanz, Javier Trujillano, Neurointensive Care and Trauma Working Group of the Spanish Society of Intensive Care Medicine (SEMICYUC)

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Early prediction of mortality upon intensive care unit admission.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024
    Article
  4. Observational
  5. Traumatic inflammatory response: pathophysiological role and clinical value of cytokines.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Luis ServiáServei de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, Universitat de Lleida, IRBLleida, Lleida, Spain.
Juan Antonio Llompart-PouServei de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Universitari Son Espases, Institut d'Investigació Sanitària Illes Balears (IdISBa), Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Mario Chico-FernándezUCI de Trauma y Emergencias, Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Neus MontserratServei de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, Universitat de Lleida, IRBLleida, Lleida, Spain.
Mariona BadiaServei de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, Universitat de Lleida, IRBLleida, Lleida, Spain.
Jesús Abelardo Barea-MendozaUCI de Trauma y Emergencias, Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
María Ángeles Ballesteros-SanzServicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain.
Javier TrujillanoServei de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, Universitat de Lleida, IRBLleida, Lleida, Spain. jtruji@cmb.udl.es.ORCID 0000-0001-8071-7711
Neurointensive Care and Trauma Working Group of the Spanish Society of Intensive Care Medicine (SEMICYUC)

Funding

Fundación Mutua Madrileña AP117892013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeverity scores are commonly used for outcome adjustment and benchmarking of trauma care provided. No specific models performed only with critically ill patients are available. Our objective was to develop a new score for early mortality prediction in trauma ICU patients.

methodsThis is a retrospective study using the Spanish Trauma ICU registry (RETRAUCI) 2015-2019. Patients were divided and analysed into the derivation (2015-2017) and validation sets (2018-2019). We used as candidate variables to be associated with mortality those available in RETRAUCI that could be collected in the first 24 h after ICU admission. Using logistic regression methodology, a simple score (RETRASCORE) was created with points assigned to each selected variable. The performance of the model was carried out according to global measures, discrimination and calibration.

resultsThe analysis included 9465 patients: derivation set 5976 and validation set 3489. Thirty-day mortality was 12.2%. The predicted probability of 30-day mortality was determined by the following equation: 1/(1 + exp (- y)), where y = 0.598 (Age 50-65) + 1.239 (Age 66-75) + 2.198 (Age > 75) + 0.349 (PRECOAG) + 0.336 (Pre-hospital intubation) + 0.662 (High-risk mechanism) + 0.950 (unilateral mydriasis) + 3.217 (bilateral mydriasis) + 0.841 (Glasgow ≤ 8) + 0.495 (MAIS-Head) - 0.271 (MAIS-Thorax) + 1.148 (Haemodynamic failure) + 0.708 (Respiratory failure) + 0.567 (Coagulopathy) + 0.580 (Mechanical ventilation) + 0.452 (Massive haemorrhage) - 5.432. The AUROC was 0.913 (0.903-0.923) in the derivation set and 0.929 (0.918-0.940) in the validation set.

conclusionsThe newly developed RETRASCORE is an early, easy-to-calculate and specific score to predict in-hospital mortality in trauma ICU patients. Although it has achieved adequate internal validation, it must be externally validated.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessIntensive Care UnitsAgedHospital MortalityHumansMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesIntensive care unitMortalityPrognostic scoring systemsTrauma and injury severity score

Identifiers

PMID34876199
PMCPMC8650319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.