Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34876197›Full record

Observational studyScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2021

Dispatch accuracy of physician-staffed emergency medical services in trauma care in south-east Norway: a retrospective observational study.

Martin Samdal, Kjetil Thorsen, Ola Græsli, Mårten Sandberg, Marius Rehn

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Physician-staffed prehospital units for severely injured patients in the Stockholm trauma system - is there a survival benefit?European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Prehospital critical care dispatch: a scoping review (PHASE).Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Performance measures of the medical priority dispatch system in an urban basic life support system.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025
    Observational
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Martin SamdalDepartment of Research, Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation, Oslo, Norway. martin.samdal@norskluftambulanse.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0916-7267
Kjetil ThorsenDepartment of Research, Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation, Oslo, Norway.
Ola GræsliPre-hospital Division, Emergency Medical Coordination Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Mårten SandbergPre-hospital Division, Air Ambulance Department, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Marius RehnDepartment of Research, Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation, Oslo, Norway.
Oslo University Hospital · NOStiftelsen Norsk Luftambulanse · NOUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSelection of incidents and accurate identification of patients that require assistance from physician-staffed emergency medical services (P-EMS) remain essential. We aimed to evaluate P-EMS availability, the underlying criteria for dispatch, and the corresponding dispatch accuracy of trauma care in south-east Norway in 2015, to identify areas for improvement.

methodsPre-hospital data from emergency medical coordination centres and P-EMS medical databases were linked with data from the Norwegian Trauma Registry (NTR). Based on a set of conditions (injury severity, interventions performed, level of consciousness, incident category), trauma incidents were defined as complex, warranting P-EMS assistance, or non-complex. Incident complexity and P-EMS involvement were the main determinants when assessing the triage accuracy. Undertriage was adjusted for P-EMS availability and response and transport times.

resultsAmong 19,028 trauma incidents, P-EMS were involved in 2506 (13.2%). The range of overtriage was 74-80% and the range of undertriage was 20-32%. P-EMS readiness in the event of complex incidents ranged from 58 to 70%. The most frequent dispatch criterion was "Police/fire brigade request immediate response" recorded in 4321 (22.7%) of the incidents. Criteria from the groups "Accidents" and "Road traffic accidents" were recorded in 10,875 (57.2%) incidents, and criteria from the groups "Transport reservations" and "Unidentified problem" in 6025 (31,7%) incidents. Among 4916 patient pathways in the NTR, 681 (13.9%) could not be matched with pre-hospital data records.

conclusionsBoth P-EMS availability and dispatch accuracy remain suboptimal in trauma care in south-east Norway. Dispatch criteria are too vague to facilitate accurate P-EMS dispatch, and pre-hospital data is inconsistent and insufficient to provide basic data for scientific research. Future dispatch criteria should focus on the care aspect of P-EMS. Better tools for both dispatch and incident handling for the emergency medical coordination centres are essential. In general, coordination, standardisation, and integration of existing data systems should enhance the quality of trauma care and increase patient safety.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical DispatchEmergency Medical ServicesPhysiciansHumansRetrospective StudiesTriageDispatchPhysician-staffed emergency medical servicesPre-hospital trauma careTriage

Identifiers

PMID34876197
PMCPMC8650530
OpenAlexW4200331919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.