Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34876155›Full record

ReviewMicrobial cell factories2021

The history, state of the art and future prospects for oleaginous yeast research.

Felix Abeln, Christopher J Chuck

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbial cell factories, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 174 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Microbial Oil Production byFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Extraction of Total Fatty Acids from Ustilago maydis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The development of a silage-based biorefinery to deliver the maximum nutritional benefit for human consumption from UK grasslands.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Sustainable Lipid Production withMicroorganisms · 2025
    Review

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Felix AbelnDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK. felix.abeln@bath.edu.
Christopher J ChuckDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK. c.chuck@bath.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0804-6751
University of Bath · GB

Funding

engineering and physical sciences research council EP/N013522/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lipid-based biofuels, such as biodiesel and hydroprocessed esters, are a central part of the global initiative to reduce the environmental impact of the transport sector. The vast majority of production is currently from first-generation feedstocks, such as rapeseed oil, and waste cooking oils. However, the increased exploitation of soybean oil and palm oil has led to vast deforestation, smog emissions and heavily impacted on biodiversity in tropical regions. One promising alternative, potentially capable of meeting future demand sustainably, are oleaginous yeasts. Despite being known about for 143 years, there has been an increasing effort in the last decade to develop a viable industrial system, with currently around 100 research papers published annually. In the academic literature, approximately 160 native yeasts have been reported to produce over 20% of their dry weight in a glyceride-rich oil. The most intensively studied oleaginous yeast have been Cutaneotrichosporon oleaginosus (20% of publications), Rhodotorula toruloides (19%) and Yarrowia lipolytica (19%). Oleaginous yeasts have been primarily grown on single saccharides (60%), hydrolysates (26%) or glycerol (19%), and mainly on the mL scale (66%). Process development and genetic modification (7%) have been applied to alter yeast performance and the lipids, towards the production of biofuels (77%), food/supplements (24%), oleochemicals (19%) or animal feed (3%). Despite over a century of research and the recent application of advanced genetic engineering techniques, the industrial production of an economically viable commodity oil substitute remains elusive. This is mainly due to the estimated high production cost, however, over the course of the twenty-first century where climate change will drastically change global food supply networks and direct governmental action will likely be levied at more destructive crops, yeast lipids offer a flexible platform for localised, sustainable lipid production. Based on data from the large majority of oleaginous yeast academic publications, this review is a guide through the history of oleaginous yeast research, an assessment of the best growth and lipid production achieved to date, the various strategies employed towards industrial production and importantly, a critical discussion about what needs to be built on this huge body of work to make producing a yeast-derived, more sustainable, glyceride oil a commercial reality.

Indexed as

ResearchBasidiomycotaBiofuelsBiomassLipidsMetabolic EngineeringYarrowiaBiofuelsLipidsBiodieselClimate changeIndustrial biotechnologyMicrobial lipidOleaginous yeastSingle-cell oilSustainabilityTriglyceride

Identifiers

PMID34876155
PMCPMC8650507
OpenAlexW4200499075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.