Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34876110›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2021

Modelling and identification of characteristic kinematic features preceding freezing of gait with convolutional neural networks and layer-wise relevance propagation.

Benjamin Filtjens, Pieter Ginis, Alice Nieuwboer, Muhammad Raheel Afzal, Joke Spildooren, Bart Vanrumste, Peter Slaets

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Benjamin FiltjensIntelligent Mobile Platform Research Group, Department of Mechanical Engineering, KU Leuven, Andreas Vesaliusstraat 13, 3000, Leuven, Belgium. benjamin.filtjens@kuleuven.be.ORCID 0000-0003-2609-6883
Pieter GinisResearch Group for Neurorehabilitation (eNRGy), Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Tervuursevest 101, 3001, Heverlee, Belgium.
Alice NieuwboerResearch Group for Neurorehabilitation (eNRGy), Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Tervuursevest 101, 3001, Heverlee, Belgium.
Muhammad Raheel AfzalIntelligent Mobile Platform Research Group, Department of Mechanical Engineering, KU Leuven, Andreas Vesaliusstraat 13, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Joke SpildoorenFaculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, REVAL - Rehabilitation Research Center, Hasselt University, Agoralaan Building A, 3590, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Bart VanrumsteeMedia Research Lab/STADIUS, Department of Electrical Engineering (ESAT), KU Leuven, Andreas Vesaliusstraat 13, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Peter SlaetsIntelligent Mobile Platform Research Group, Department of Mechanical Engineering, KU Leuven, Andreas Vesaliusstraat 13, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough deep neural networks (DNNs) are showing state of the art performance in clinical gait analysis, they are considered to be black-box algorithms. In other words, there is a lack of direct understanding of a DNN's ability to identify relevant features, hindering clinical acceptance. Interpretability methods have been developed to ameliorate this concern by providing a way to explain DNN predictions.

methodsThis paper proposes the use of an interpretability method to explain DNN decisions for classifying the movement that precedes freezing of gait (FOG), one of the most debilitating symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD). The proposed two-stage pipeline consists of (1) a convolutional neural network (CNN) to model the reduction of movement present before a FOG episode, and (2) layer-wise relevance propagation (LRP) to visualize the underlying features that the CNN perceives as important to model the pathology. The CNN was trained with the sagittal plane kinematics from a motion capture dataset of fourteen PD patients with FOG. The robustness of the model predictions and learned features was further assessed on fourteen PD patients without FOG and fourteen age-matched healthy controls.

resultsThe CNN proved highly accurate in modelling the movement that precedes FOG, with 86.8% of the strides being correctly identified. However, the CNN model was unable to model the movement for one of the seven patients that froze during the protocol. The LRP interpretability case study shows that (1) the kinematic features perceived as most relevant by the CNN are the reduced peak knee flexion and the fixed ankle dorsiflexion during the swing phase, (2) very little relevance for FOG is observed in the PD patients without FOG and the healthy control subjects, and (3) the poor predictive performance of one subject is attributed to the patient's unique and severely flexed gait signature.

conclusionsThe proposed pipeline can aid clinicians in explaining DNN decisions in clinical gait analysis and aid machine learning practitioners in assessing the generalization of their models by ensuring that the predictions are based on meaningful kinematic features.

Indexed as

Gait Disorders, NeurologicParkinson DiseaseBiomechanical PhenomenaGaitHumansNeural Networks, ComputerConvolutional neural networksExplainable artificial intelligenceFreezing of gaitGait analysisParkinson’s disease

Identifiers

PMID34876110
PMCPMC8650332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.