Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34876053›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2021

Serotype distribution and incidence of invasive early onset and late onset group B streptococcal disease amongst infants in Singapore.

Kai-Qian Kam, Koh Cheng Thoon, Wen Sim Nancy Tee, Michelle Lay Teng Ang, Natalie Woon Hui Tan, Kee Thai Yeo, Jiahui Li, Chia Yin Chong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Strategies to Prevent Early and Late-Onset Group BPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kai-Qian KamInfectious Disease Service, Department of Pediatrics, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, 100 Bukit Timah, Singapore City, 229899, Singapore. kam.kai.qian@singhealth.com.sg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2402-7262
Koh Cheng ThoonInfectious Disease Service, Department of Pediatrics, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, 100 Bukit Timah, Singapore City, 229899, Singapore.
Wen Sim Nancy TeeDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, National University Health System, Singapore City, Singapore.
Michelle Lay Teng AngNational Public Health Laboratory, National Centre of Infectious Diseases, Singapore City, Singapore.
Natalie Woon Hui TanInfectious Disease Service, Department of Pediatrics, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, 100 Bukit Timah, Singapore City, 229899, Singapore.
Kee Thai YeoYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore City, Singapore.
Jiahui LiInfectious Disease Service, Department of Pediatrics, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, 100 Bukit Timah, Singapore City, 229899, Singapore.
Chia Yin ChongInfectious Disease Service, Department of Pediatrics, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, 100 Bukit Timah, Singapore City, 229899, Singapore.
National University of Singapore · SGNational Centre for Infectious Diseases · SGNational University Health System · SGSingHealth · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe current group B streptococcal (GBS) preventive measures had reduced invasive GBS early onset disease (EOD) incidences worldwide, but the late onset disease (LOD) incidences had remained unchanged. Administration of a safe and effective GBS vaccine in addition to the current strategies were thought to be the next steps in reducing the incidences of invasive GBS infection especially LOD. In this study, we aimed to examine the causative GBS serotypes in invasive GBS disease, determine the incidences of EOD and LOD, and compare the risk factors between EOD and LOD.

methodsA retrospective study of infants ≤ 90-day-old over an 8-year period (2010-2017). The incidences of EOD and LOD were obtained by using patients with EOD and LOD who were born in our institution as the numerator and the live births in our institution per year of the study period as the denominator. Available GBS isolates were serotyped by the National Public Health Laboratory using capsular serotyping methods. The risk factors of EOD and LOD were compared.

resultsA total of 71 infants were identified; 16 (22.5%) and 55 (77.5%) of them had EOD and LOD, respectively. Serotype III (n = 42, 71.2%) was the most common serotype amongst the 59 isolates available for serotyping. Serotypes Ia, Ib, II, III, and V accounted for 98.3% (n = 58) of the invasive GBS diseases. The overall incidence was 0.42 per 1000 live births. The mean incidences of EOD and LOD were 0.13 per 1000 live births and 0.29 per 1000 live births, respectively. On multivariate analysis, risk factors for LOD as compared to EOD were: Chinese ethnicity (OR 27.1, 95% CI 3.0-243.1, p = 0.003) and negative/unknown maternal GBS status (OR 20.0, 95% CI 2.0-250.0, p = 0.012). Prematurity and intrapartum risk factors (peripartum maternal pyrexia, prolonged rupture of membrane) of EOD were not associated with LOD.

conclusionsThe LOD incidence had remained higher than EOD incidence in our cohort. A GBS vaccine that covers the major causative serotypes found in our cohort can potentially reduce the overall GBS disease burden in the country.

Indexed as

Late Onset DisordersStreptococcal InfectionsHumansIncidenceInfantRetrospective StudiesSerogroupSingaporeStreptococcus agalactiaeEODGBSGroup B streptococcusIncidenceLODRisk factorsSerotypeSingapore

Identifiers

PMID34876053
PMCPMC8650237
OpenAlexW4200548823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.