ArticleBMC bioinformatics2021
An efficient scRNA-seq dropout imputation method using graph attention network.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Graph neural networks for single-cell omics data: a review of approaches and applications.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Pooled it
- A Method for Imputing scRNA-seq Data Based on Mobile Graph Convolutional Generative Adversarial Networks.Biochemical genetics · 2026Article
- Integrating single-cell RNA sequencing with multi-omics to decode disease microenvironments.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- GTsurvival: A Hybrid GCN-Neural Decision Tree Model for Restricted Mean Survival Time Prediction with Complex Censored Data.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Generative and integrative modeling for transcriptomics with formalin fixed paraffin embedded material.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- scVGAMF: a novel imputation method for scRNA-seq data by integrating linear and non-linear features.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- scPDA: denoising protein expression in droplet-based single-cell data.Genome biology · 2025Article
- Super-enhancer-mediated circRNAs exhibit high splicing circularization diversity and transcriptional activity.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- scE2EGAE: enhancing single-cell RNA-Seq data analysis through an end-to-end cell-graph-learnable graph autoencoder with differentiable edge sampling.Biology direct · 2025Article
- Imputing single-cell protein abundance in multiplex tissue imaging.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Reconstruction, simulation and analysis of enzyme-constrained metabolic models using GECKO Toolbox 3.0.Nature protocols · 2024Review
- [Imputation method for dropout in single-cell transcriptome data].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2023Review
- Boosting Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Analysis with Simple Neural Attention.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Application of Deep Learning on Single-cell RNA Sequencing Data Analysis: A Review.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSingle-cell sequencing technology can address the amount of single-cell library data at the same time and display the heterogeneity of different cells. However, analyzing single-cell data is a computationally challenging problem. Because there are low counts in the gene expression region, it has a high chance of recognizing the non-zero entity as zero, which are called dropout events. At present, the mainstream dropout imputation methods cannot effectively recover the true expression of cells from dropout noise such as DCA, MAGIC, scVI, scImpute and SAVER.
resultsIn this paper, we propose an autoencoder structure network, named GNNImpute. GNNImpute uses graph attention convolution to aggregate multi-level similar cell information and implements convolution operations on non-Euclidean space on scRNA-seq data. Distinct from current imputation tools, GNNImpute can accurately and effectively impute the dropout and reduce dropout noise. We use mean square error (MSE), mean absolute error (MAE), Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) and Cosine similarity (CS) to measure the performance of different methods with GNNImpute. We analyze four real datasets, and our results show that the GNNImpute achieves 3.0130 MSE, 0.6781 MAE, 0.9073 PCC and 0.9134 CS. Furthermore, we use Adjusted rand index (ARI) and Normalized mutual information (NMI) to measure the clustering effect. The GNNImpute achieves 0.8199 (ARI) and 0.8368 (NMI), respectively.
conclusionsIn this investigation, we propose a single-cell dropout imputation method (GNNImpute), which effectively utilizes shared information for imputing the dropout of scRNA-seq data. We test it with different real datasets and evaluate its effectiveness in MSE, MAE, PCC and CS. The results show that graph attention convolution and autoencoder structure have great potential in single-cell dropout imputation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.