Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34875403›Full record

ArticleTransplantation and cellular therapy2022

Rates and Predictors of Nonadherence to the Post-Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Medical Regimen in Patients and Caregivers.

Donna M Posluszny, Dana H Bovbjerg, Karen L Syrjala, Mounzer Agha, Rafic Farah, Jing-Zhou Hou, Anastasios Raptis, Annie P Im, Kathleen A Dorritie, Michael M Boyiadzis and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation and cellular therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07107165 (Adapting After Discharge From Allogeneic SCT), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07107165 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Adapting After Discharge From Allogeneic SCT: Partnering Together; Dyadic Intervention to Improve Patient-Family Caregiver Team-Based Management of the Medical Regimen After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PittsburghRan2025 to 2027Enrolled208ConditionsStem Cell Transplant, Hematopoetic Stem Cell Transplant, Hematopoetic Stem Cell TransplantationArmsDyadic Problem Solving Training, Supportive Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Intervention Development to Promote Medical Adherence After Stem Cell Transplant.Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Can you spare 100 days? The allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant caregiver requirement from the perspective of social workers.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Donna M PoslusznyDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA. Electronic address: poslusznydm@upmc.edu.
Dana H BovbjergDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Karen L SyrjalaClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Mounzer AghaDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
Rafic FarahUPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
Jing-Zhou HouUPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
Anastasios RaptisUPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
Annie P ImDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
Kathleen A DorritieDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
Michael M BoyiadzisDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
Mary Amanda DewDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
University of Pittsburgh · USUPMC Hillman Cancer Center · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

VECTOR CORE FACILITYP30CA047904 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI JOHN C. BYRD · 1988 to 2026
$158.0M
Adherence to the HCT Medical Regimen: Influence of Cancer Patient-Cargiver DyadsK23CA149082 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI POSLUSZNY, DONNA M · 2011 to 2015
$531k
NCI NIH HHS K23 CA149082NCI NIH HHS P30 CA047904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) requires a complex, multicomponent medical regimen after hospital discharge. Patients must manage multiple medications; care for their catheter; minimize exposure to sources of potential infection; follow diet, exercise, and self-care guidelines; and attend frequent follow-up medical appointments. Their caregivers are tasked with helping them manage the regimen. Despite the importance of this management in preventing adverse clinical outcomes, there has been little study of regimen nonadherence and its predictors. We sought to prospectively determine rates and predictors of nonadherence to components of the post-HCT medical regimen during the first 8 weeks after hospital discharge. Patients (n = 92) and their caregivers (n = 91) (total n = 183) completed interview assessments pre-HCT, and at 4 weeks and 8 weeks after hospital discharge post-HCT. Sociodemographic factors (eg, age, sex), patient clinical status (eg, disease type, donor type), patient and caregiver self-reported health-related factors (eg, medical comorbidities), and patient and caregiver psychosocial factors (eg, anxiety, depression, HCT task-specific and general self-efficacy, relationship quality) were assessed pre-HCT. Nonadherence to each of 17 regimen tasks was assessed at 4 and 8 weeks after hospital discharge via self and caregiver collateral reports. Nonadherence rates varied among tasks, with 11.2% to 15.7% of the sample reporting nonadherence to immunosuppressant medication, 34.8% to 38.6% to other types of medications, 14.6% to 67.4% to required infection precautions, and 27.0% to 68.5% to lifestyle-related behaviors (eg, diet/exercise). Nonadherence rates were generally stable but worsened over time for lifestyle-related behaviors. The most consistent nonadherence predictors were patient and caregiver pre-HCT perceptions of lower HCT task efficacy. Higher caregiver depression, caregiver perceptions of poorer relationship with the patient, having a nonspousal caregiver, and having diseases other than acute myelogenous leukemia also predicted greater nonadherence in 1 or more areas. Rates of nonadherence varied across tasks, and both patient and caregiver factors, particularly self-efficacy, predicted nonadherence. The findings highlight the importance of considering not only patient factors, but also caregiver factors, in post-HCT regimen nonadherence.

Indexed as

CaregiversHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansQuality of LifeAdherenceAllogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantationCaregiverDyadEfficacy

Identifiers

PMID34875403
PMCPMC9004486
OpenAlexW4200273473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.