Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34875065›Full record

ArticleHealth policy and planning2022

Implementing COVID-19 surveillance through inter-organizational coordination: a qualitative study of three cities in Colombia.

Simon Turner, Carolina Segura, Natalia Niño

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health policy and planning, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. COVID-19 in Colombia and Venezuela: Two Sides of the Coin.American journal of public health · 2022
    Article
  10. COVID-19 in Colombia and Venezuela: Two Sides of the Coin.American journal of public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Simon TurnerSchool of Management, University of los Andes, Edificio SD, Cl. 21 #1-20, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-1801-8351
Carolina SeguraSchool of Management, University of los Andes, Edificio SD, Cl. 21 #1-20, Bogotá, Colombia.
Natalia NiñoSchool of Medicine, University of los Andes, Carrera 1 No 18 A - 10, Bloque Q Piso 8, Bogotá, Colombia.
Universidad de Los Andes · CO

Funding

Colombian Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation 1204101577001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introducing comprehensive surveillance is recommended as an urgent public health measure to control and mitigate the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) worldwide. However, its implementation has proven challenging as it requires inter-organizational coordination among multiple healthcare stakeholders. The purpose of this study was to examine the role of soft and hard mechanisms in the implementation of inter-organizational coordination strategies for COVID-19 surveillance within Colombia, drawing on evidence from the cities of Bogotá, Cali and Cartagena. The study used a case study approach to understand the perspectives of local and national authorities, insurance companies and health providers in the implementation of inter-organizational coordination strategies for COVID-19 surveillance. Eighty-one semi-structured interviews were conducted between June and November 2020. The data were analysed by codes and categorized using New NVivo software. The study identified inter-organizational coordination strategies that were implemented to provide COVID-19 surveillance in the three cities. Both soft (e.g. trust and shared purpose) and hard mechanisms (e.g. formal agreements and regulations) acted as mediators for collaboration and helped to address existing structural barriers in the provision of health services. The findings suggest that soft and hard mechanisms contributed to promoting change among healthcare system stakeholders and improved inter-organizational coordination for disease surveillance. The findings contribute to evidence regarding practices to improve coordinated surveillance of disease, including the roles of new forms of financing and contracting between insurers and public and private health service providers, logistics regarding early diagnosis in infectious disease and the provision of health services at the community level regardless of insurance affiliation. Our research provides evidence to improve disease surveillance frameworks in fragmented health systems contributing to public health planning and health system improvement.

Indexed as

COVID-19CitiesColombiaHumansQualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2United StatesCare coordinationcare integrationcoordinationCOVID-19inter-organizationalpublic healthqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID34875065
PMCPMC8689710
OpenAlexW4200520946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.