Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34874999›Full record

ArticleAnnals of botany2023

Complex polyploid and hybrid species in an apomictic and sexual tropical forage grass group: genomic composition and evolution in Urochloa (Brachiaria) species.

Paulina Tomaszewska, Maria S Vorontsova, Stephen A Renvoize, Sarah Z Ficinski, Joseph Tohme, Trude Schwarzacher, Valheria Castiblanco, José J de Vega, Rowan A C Mitchell, J S Pat Heslop-Harrison

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of botany, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Advances in genomic characterization of Urochloa humidicola: exploring polyploid inheritance and apomixis.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Paulina TomaszewskaDepartment of Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9596-7219
Maria S VorontsovaRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0899-1120
Stephen A RenvoizeRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, UK.
Sarah Z FicinskiRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, UK.
Joseph TohmeInternational Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), A.A. 6713, Cali, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0003-2765-7101
Trude SchwarzacherDepartment of Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8310-5489
Valheria CastiblancoInternational Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), A.A. 6713, Cali, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0003-2801-2153
José J de VegaEarlham Institute, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2847-5158
Rowan A C MitchellRothamsted Research, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1412-8828
J S Pat Heslop-HarrisonDepartment of Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3105-2167
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew · GBUniversity of Leicester · GBInternational Center for Tropical Agriculture · CONorwich Research Park · GBRothamsted Research · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/R022828/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsDiploid and polyploid Urochloa (including Brachiaria, Panicum and Megathyrsus species) C4 tropical forage grasses originating from Africa are important for food security and the environment, often being planted in marginal lands worldwide. We aimed to characterize the nature of their genomes, the repetitive DNA and the genome composition of polyploids, leading to a model of the evolutionary pathways within the group including many apomictic species.

methodsSome 362 forage grass accessions from international germplasm collections were studied, and ploidy was determined using an optimized flow cytometry method. Whole-genome survey sequencing and molecular cytogenetic analysis were used to identify chromosomes and genomes in Urochloa accessions belonging to the 'brizantha' and 'humidicola' agamic complexes and U. maxima. KEY

resultsGenome structures are complex and variable, with multiple ploidies and genome compositions within the species, and no clear geographical patterns. Sequence analysis of nine diploid and polyploid accessions enabled identification of abundant genome-specific repetitive DNA motifs. In situ hybridization with a combination of repetitive DNA and genomic DNA probes identified evolutionary divergence and allowed us to discriminate the different genomes present in polyploids.

conclusionsWe suggest a new coherent nomenclature for the genomes present. We develop a model of evolution at the whole-genome level in diploid and polyploid accessions showing processes of grass evolution. We support the retention of narrow species concepts for Urochloa brizantha, U. decumbens and U. ruziziensis, and do not consider diploids and polyploids of single species as cytotypes. The results and model will be valuable in making rational choices of parents for new hybrids, assist in use of the germplasm for breeding and selection of Urochloa with improved sustainability and agronomic potential, and assist in measuring and conserving biodiversity in grasslands.

Indexed as

BrachiariaPoaceaeGenomicsPloidiesPolyploidyapomixisBrachiariaevolutiongenome-specific sequencesPolyploidyrepetitive DNA motifstropical forage grasses

Identifiers

PMID34874999
PMCPMC9904353
OpenAlexW4206127199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.