Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34874530›Full record

ArticleAmbio2022

Pollution in the Arctic Ocean: An overview of multiple pressures and implications for ecosystem services.

Bryony L Townhill, Efstathios Reppas-Chrysovitsinos, Roxana Sühring, Crispin J Halsall, Elena Mengo, Tina Sanders, Kirsten Dähnke, Odile Crabeck, Jan Kaiser, Silvana N R Birchenough

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Clam research in Nunavut: A scoping review of the literature.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025
    Review
  2. Estimating the Economic Values of Restricted MonocultureInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Bryony L TownhillThe Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas), Pakefield Road, Lowestoft, Suffolk, NR33 0HT, UK. bryony.townhill@cefas.co.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1906-1885
Efstathios Reppas-ChrysovitsinosLancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YQ, UK.
Roxana SühringDepartment of Environmental Science, Stockholm University, 106 91, Stockholm, Sweden.
Crispin J HalsallLancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YQ, UK.
Elena MengoThe Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas), Pakefield Road, Lowestoft, Suffolk, NR33 0HT, UK.
Tina SandersHelmholtz-Zentrum Hereon, Institute for Carbon Cycles, Max-Planck-Str. 1, 21502, Geesthacht, Germany.
Kirsten DähnkeHelmholtz-Zentrum Hereon, Institute for Carbon Cycles, Max-Planck-Str. 1, 21502, Geesthacht, Germany.
Odile CrabeckCentre for Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK.
Jan KaiserCentre for Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK.
Silvana N R BirchenoughThe Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas), Pakefield Road, Lowestoft, Suffolk, NR33 0HT, UK.

Funding

Natural Environment Research Council NE/R012857/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Arctic is undergoing unprecedented change. Observations and models demonstrate significant perturbations to the physical and biological systems. Arctic species and ecosystems, particularly in the marine environment, are subject to a wide range of pressures from human activities, including exposure to a complex mixture of pollutants, climate change and fishing activity. These pressures affect the ecosystem services that the Arctic provides. Current international policies are attempting to support sustainable exploitation of Arctic resources with a view to balancing human wellbeing and environmental protection. However, assessments of the potential combined impacts of human activities are limited by data, particularly related to pollutants, a limited understanding of physical and biological processes, and single policies that are limited to ecosystem-level actions. This manuscript considers how, when combined, a suite of existing tools can be used to assess the impacts of pollutants in combination with other anthropogenic pressures on Arctic ecosystems, and on the services that these ecosystems provide. Recommendations are made for the advancement of targeted Arctic research to inform environmental practices and regulatory decisions.

Indexed as

Anthropogenic EffectsEcosystemArctic RegionsHumansHuntingOceans and SeasChemicalsContaminantsEcopathManagementModellingPolicy

Identifiers

PMID34874530
PMCPMC8692579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.