Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34874515›Full record

ArticleAdvances in therapy2022

An Economic Analysis of Critical Care Nurse Resourcing Following the Uptake of Ready-to-Administer Noradrenaline for Hypotensive Shock in Adults in England.

Edward Griffin, Oliver Tweedie, Justin Kirk-Bayley

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Edward GriffinEd Griffin Ltd, Exeter, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3587-8417
Oliver TweedieSintetica Ltd, 30th Floor, 40 Bank Street, Canary Wharf, London, E14 5NR, UK. Oliver.Tweedie@sintetica.co.uk.
Justin Kirk-BayleyRoyal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK.
Canary Wharf Group (United Kingdom) · GBRoyal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionReady-to-administer formulations for intravenous administration of noradrenaline are now broadly recommended and predicted to reduce pressure on critical care nursing. This analysis sought to quantify the nurse resource released from national level transition.

methodsThe annual number of noradrenaline support days for hypotensive shock was determined and the administration of noradrenaline was simulated over 24 h using a decision tree. A 'best-practice' ready-to-administer strategy (RtA) of volumetrically pumped noradrenaline was compared to a 'nil uptake' strategy (AfC) of bedside prepared solution delivered either volumetrically or using a double syringe pump. A mix of noradrenaline concentrations, flow rates, product sizes, and preferences for ampoule pooling, preparation volume, and sterility were included. The consumption of nurse days and product units was then projected over 1 year for a population of adults in critical care in England.

resultsNoradrenaline was administered over 231,011 days per year across 4123 critical care beds in England. Implementing a transition from AfC to RtA strategies on this scale released 35,791 nurse days or 176 whole-time nurse equivalents at 50/50 NHS band 5 and 6, a monetised release of £11.6 million. There was an increase in drug acquisition cost of £2.1 million using the licensed commercial product Sinora

conclusionsThis modelling of ready-to-administer noradrenaline with volumetric delivery quantifies and bears out the recommendations of the Lord Carter review, the Royal Pharmaceutical Society, and the NHS Specialist Pharmacy Service in their encouragement of ready-to-administer formulations for safe and resource-effective critical care.

Indexed as

Critical CareNorepinephrineAdministration, IntravenousAdultCost-Benefit AnalysisEnglandHumansSyringesNorepinephrineBudget impactHypotensive shockMedication safetyNoradrenalineNursingReady-to-administerResource-saving

Identifiers

PMID34874515
PMCPMC8649679
OpenAlexW4200342492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.