Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34874454›Full record

ReviewEmerging topics in life sciences2021

Radiomics, deep learning and early diagnosis in oncology.

Peng Wei

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Emerging topics in life sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peng WeiDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0001-7758-6116
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center SPORE in Hepatocellular CarcinomaP50CA217674 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI BERETTA, LAURA, KASEB, AHMED · 2019 to 2023
$11.3M
Association analysis of rare variants with sequencing dataR01HL116720 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI PAN, WEI, WEI, PENG · 2013 to 2020
$3.3M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA217674NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL116720
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical imaging, including X-ray, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), plays a critical role in early detection, diagnosis, and treatment response prediction of cancer. To ease radiologists' task and help with challenging cases, computer-aided diagnosis has been developing rapidly in the past decade, pioneered by radiomics early on, and more recently, driven by deep learning. In this mini-review, I use breast cancer as an example and review how medical imaging and its quantitative modeling, including radiomics and deep learning, have improved the early detection and treatment response prediction of breast cancer. I also outline what radiomics and deep learning share in common and how they differ in terms of modeling procedure, sample size requirement, and computational implementation. Finally, I discuss the challenges and efforts entailed to integrate deep learning models and software in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDeep LearningDiagnostic ImagingNeoplasmsRadiometryEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansTomography, X-Ray Computedcancerdeep learningearly detectionmedical imagingradiomics

Identifiers

PMID34874454
PMCPMC8786297
OpenAlexW4200293754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.