Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34874125›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2022

Cancer-associated stroma reveals prognostic biomarkers and novel insights into the tumour microenvironment of colorectal cancer and colorectal liver metastases.

Kai M Brown, Aiqun Xue, Ross C Smith, Jaswinder S Samra, Anthony J Gill, Thomas J Hugh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Safety and efficacy ofEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kai M BrownCancer Surgery and Metabolism Research Group, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9649-7343
Aiqun XueCancer Surgery and Metabolism Research Group, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.
Ross C SmithCancer Surgery and Metabolism Research Group, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.
Jaswinder S SamraUpper GI Surgical Unit, Royal North Shore Hospital and North Shore Private Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.
Anthony J GillNorthern Clinical School, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Thomas J HughCancer Surgery and Metabolism Research Group, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.
The University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsCancer-associated stroma (CAS) is emerging as a key determinant of metastasis in colorectal cancer (CRC); however, little is known about CAS in colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). This study aimed to validate the prognostic significance of stromal protein biomarkers in primary CRC and CRLM. Secondly, this study aimed to describe the transcriptome of the CAS of CRLM and identify novel targetable pathways of metastasis.

methodsA case-control study design from a prospectively maintained database was adopted. The prognostic value of epithelial and stromal CALD1, IGFBP7, POSTN, FAP, TGF-β and pSMAD2 expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in multivariate models. Pathway enrichment and sparse partial least square-discriminant analysis (sPLS-DA) were performed on a nested cohort after isolating epithelial tumour and CAS by laser capture microdissection.

results110 CRCs with 124 paired CRLMs, and 110 matched non-metastatic control CRCs were included. Median follow-up was 62 and 45 months for primary and CRLM groups, respectively. Stromal FAP and POSTN were independent predictors for the development of CRLM. After CRLM resection, stromal IGFBP7 and POSTN were predictors of poorer survival. sPLS-DA on the nested cohort identified a number of novel targetable stromal genes and pathways that defined poor prognosis CRC and the CAS of CRLM.

conclusionsThis study is the first to describe key differences in stromal gene expression between paired primary CRC and CRLM as well as identifying several targetable biomarkers and transcriptomic pathways whose relevance specifically in the CAS of CRC and CRLM have not been previously described.

Indexed as

Tumor MicroenvironmentAgedBiomarkers, TumorCase-Control StudiesColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansImmunohistochemistryLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisStromal CellsSurvival RateBiomarkers, Tumorbiomarkercolorectal cancerliver metastasesstromatumour microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID34874125
PMCPMC8729056
OpenAlexW4200350860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.