ArticleCureus2021
Improving the Quality of Medical Documentation in Orthopedic Surgical Notes Using the Surgical Tool for Auditing Records (STAR) Score.
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
- An Audit of General Surgery Clinical Records (2021) in Ribat University Hospital, Sudan.Cureus · 2024Article
- Assessment of the quality of oral squamous cell carcinoma clinical records in oral surgery with Surgical Tool for Auditing Records (STAR) scoring.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- A Closed-Loop Clinical Audit of Surgical Documentation of Inpatient Records at a Tertiary Level Hospital in Egypt.Cureus · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims Due to the significant value held by medical records in terms of influencing patient care and medico-legal cases, this study aimed to investigate the quality of surgical notes and their improvement through periodic auditing during a six-year period at a major tertiary hospital. Methodology This study retrospectively evaluated surgical records of patients undergoing elective orthopedic surgeries at Jordan University Hospital from 2016 to 2021 using the Surgical Tool for Auditing Records (STAR) validated questionnaire. This questionnaire is composed of six distinct sections aimed to quantify the quality of medical records and demonstrate their associated deficiencies. Pre- and post-audit STAR scores were analyzed using the two independent sample t-test on Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23.0 (IBM Corp. Armonk, NY). Results A total of 454 records were randomly selected and evaluated using the STAR questionnaire. There was an overall significant trend of improvement in the quality of records in all evaluated years compared to the 2016 baseline. The most pronounced improvements were in the records of 2021 as compared to the 2016 baseline (97.4 ± 0.7 vs. 94.3 ± 1.6; p:<0.05), in which the Initial Clerking, Subsequent Entries, and Operative Record domains had the most significant magnitude of change. The Consent and Anesthesia domains plateaued over the study's period in terms of overall quality. The most improved STAR domain was the Discharge Summary domain, in which four subsections (follow-up, diagnosis, complications, and medications on discharge) had significant STAR score increases (all; p:<0.05). Conclusion Our study implies that simple measures, including personnel education and training and periodic auditing, are effective measures in increasing the quality of surgical records. High-quality medical records need to be sustained and continuously improved, as they contribute to better health care, promote research, and contribute to economic gains through cost-effective practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.