ArticleCureus2021
Translation, Cultural Adaptation, Validity, and Internal Consistency of the Greek Version of the Individual Workload Perceptions Scale-Revised.
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the individual workload perception scale-revised (IWPS-R) in Spanish nurses.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Article
- The effect of the online stress management program on individual workload perception and stress in nurses: a non-randomized quasi-experimental design study.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Translation and Validation of the Individual Workload Perception Scale-Revised for Portuguese Nurses.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe working environment in hospitals has been characterized as very important for the improvement of the provided care and the nurses' job satisfaction. The aim of the current study was translation and cultural adaptation of the Individual Workload Perceptions Scale-Revised (IWPS-R) as well as the investigation of the validity and internal consistency of the scale.
methodsThis is a cross-sectional, descriptive study involving 365 Greek nurses from two large hospitals in Athens, Greece. Nurses completed the Individual Workload Perceptions Scale-Revised, which is a self-administered questionnaire consisting of 29 items on a five-point Likert-type scale. For the translation, the scale was first translated into the Greek language (forward translation) and then into the English language (backward translation) and culturally adapted. For the study of the construct validity, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed, while the criterion of the convergent validity was between the five factors of the scale. To study the reliability, the method of test-retest was performed while Cronbach's alpha coefficient was used to study the internal consistency of the scale. Data analysis was performed via the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), version 21.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY).
resultsAccording to the exploratory factor analysis, the Greek version of the Individual Workload Perceptions Scale-Revised consists of five factors (Manager Support, Peer Support, Unit Support, Workload, and Intent to Stay) explaining 51.4% of the total variance. From the confirmatory factor analysis, the model was equivalent to the original factorial structure of the IWPS-R. Τhe convergent validity revealed a positive correlation between all the domains of the scale (p < 0.001). The test-retest method showed that there are no significant differences between the first and the second measurements (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.990, p < 0.001). The internal consistency was very good (Cronbach's alpha coefficient = 0.878).
conclusionsThe IWPS-R is a reliable and valid instrument for Greek nurses to measure the perceptions of the nursing working environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.