ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2021
Quantitative analysis of approximate shapes in a myofiber cross-section and their relationship with myofiber cross-sectional area.
Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[Purpose] Although the shapes observed in myofiber cross-sections have been subjectively identified as polygonal, precise methodologies to classify such shapes have not been elucidated previously. Therefore, we aimed to determine the approximate shapes found in myofiber cross-sections, and to elucidate their relationship with the myofiber cross-sectional area. [Materials and Methods] Soleus muscles of five 11-week-old male Wistar rats were collected as specimens. The muscle specimens were rapid-frozen in isopentane-cooled in dry ice and acetone-and sliced into 10-μm slices in a cryostat and stained with hematoxylin-eosin. The NIH ImageJ software was used to analyze the number of corners that were counted according to the proposed criteria and the myofiber cross-sectional areas of 500 myofibers. [Results] In assessments of the approximate shapes of myofiber cross-sections, the proportion of pentagons was 41%, which was the highest among polygons. A weak positive correlation was noted between the corner count and myofiber cross-sectional area, which indicated that polygons with more corners were associated with a larger myofiber cross-sectional area. [Conclusion] The myofiber cross-sections of the soleus muscle were considered to frequently show an approximately pentagonal shape. Moreover, a correlation was observed between the myofiber cross-section shape and myofiber cross-sectional area, suggesting that the area was also associated with the relevant functional features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.