Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34873279›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Immunology2022

The germinal centre B cell response to SARS-CoV-2.

Brian J Laidlaw, Ali H Ellebedy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 188 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
188citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

188 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A new mRNA antigen vaccine induces potent B and T cell responses andbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Extrafollicular and other non-germinal center B cell responses.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2026
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

128 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Brian J LaidlawDivision of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA. brian.laidlaw@wustl.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5707-9256
Ali H EllebedyDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA. ellebedy@wustl.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6129-2532

Funding

COLLABORATIVE INFLUENZA VACCINE INNOVATION CENTER: UNIVERSAL INFLUENZA VACCINE RESEARCH75N93019C00051 · NIAID · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI KRAMMER, FLORIAN · 2019 to 2025
$105.4M
DYNAMICS AND EVOLUTION OF IMMUNE RESPONSES TO INFLUENZA VIRUSESU01AI150747 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI AHMED, RAFI, ANTIA, RUSTOM NOSHIR · 2020 to 2024
$5.9M
Programming Durable Immune Responses To VaccinationU01AI141990 · NIAID · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Ali Hassan Ellebedy · 2019 to 2026
$5.3M
Enhancing the antiviral memory B cell responseDP2AI169978 · NIAID · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI LAIDLAW, BRIAN · 2021 to 2024
$2.2M
Lung-resident memory B cell development and function following influenza virus infectionK22AI153015 · NIAID · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI LAIDLAW, BRIAN · 2020 to 2021
$270k
NIAID NIH HHS 75N93019C00051NIAID NIH HHS DP2 AI169978NIAID NIH HHS DP2AI169978NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201400006CNIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201400008CNIAID NIH HHS K22 AI153015NIAID NIH HHS K22AI153015NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI141990NIAID NIH HHS U01AI141990NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI150747NIAID NIH HHS U01AI150747
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The germinal centre (GC) response is critical for the generation of affinity-matured plasma cells and memory B cells capable of mediating long-term protective immunity. Understanding whether severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection or vaccination elicits a GC response has profound implications for the capacity of responding B cells to contribute to protection against infection. However, direct assessment of the GC response in humans remains a major challenge. Here we summarize emerging evidence for the importance of the GC response in the establishment of durable and broad immunity against SARS-CoV-2 and discuss new approaches to modulate the GC response to better protect against newly emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants. We also discuss new findings showing that the GC B cell response persists in the draining lymph nodes for at least 6 months in some individuals following vaccination with SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-based vaccines.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesGerminal CenterHumansMemory B CellsmRNA VaccinesSARS-CoV-2Antibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesmRNA Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID34873279
PMCPMC8647067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.