Trial reportScientific reports2021
A nomogram for predicting probability of low risk of MammaPrint results in women with clinically high-risk breast cancer.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes differ across MammaPrint® classifications in breast cancer.Endocrine-related cancer · 2026Article
- In Search of Ideal Solutions for Cancer Diagnosis: From Conventional Methods to Protein Biomarkers in Liquid Biopsy.Proteomes · 2025Review
- Article
- Radiomic Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Breast Cancer withDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- A simplified risk scoring system for predicting high-risk groups in gene expression tests for patients with estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, and node-positive breast cancer.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2023Article
- Breast Cancer in the United Arab Emirates.JCO global oncology · 2023Review
- Validation study of a nomogram for predicting probability of low risk of MammaPrint results in women with clinically high-risk breast cancer.Discover oncology · 2022Article
- Development and validation of an extended Cox prognostic model for patients with ER/PR+ and HER2- breast cancer: a retrospective cohort study.World journal of surgical oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We aimed to develop a prediction MammaPrint (MMP) genomic risk assessment nomogram model for hormone-receptor positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer and minimal axillary burden (N0-1) tumors using clinicopathological factors of patients who underwent an MMP test for decision making regarding adjuvant chemotherapy. A total of 409 T1-3 N0-1 M0 HR + and HER2- breast cancer patients whose MMP genomic risk results and clinicopathological factors were available from 2017 to 2020 were analyzed. With randomly selected 306 patients, we developed a nomogram for predicting a low-risk subgroup of MMP results and externally validated with remaining patients (n = 103). Multivariate analysis revealed that the age at diagnosis, progesterone receptor (PR) score, nuclear grade, and Ki-67 were significantly associated with MMP risk results. We developed an MMP low-risk predictive nomogram. With a cut off value at 5% and 95% probability of low-risk MMP, the nomogram accurately predicted the results with 100% positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value respectively. When applied to cut-off value at 35%, the specificity and PPV was 95% and 86% respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77 to 0.87). When applied to the validation group, the nomogram was accurate with an area under the curve of 0.77 (95% CI 0.68 to 0.86). Our nomogram, which incorporates four traditional prognostic factors, i.e., age, PR, nuclear grade, and Ki-67, could predict the probability of obtaining a low MMP risk in a cohort of high clinical risk patients. This nomogram can aid the prompt selection of patients who does not need additional MMP testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.