Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34873148›Full record

ArticleBlood cancer journal2021

Dynamic assessment of measurable residual disease in favorable-risk acute myeloid leukemia in first remission, treatment, and outcomes.

Sijian Yu, Tong Lin, Danian Nie, Yu Zhang, Zhiqiang Sun, Qing Zhang, Caixia Wang, Mujun Xiong, Zhiping Fan, Fen Huang and 14 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood cancer journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Prognostic impact ofTherapeutic advances in hematology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Sijian Yu *Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Tong Lin *Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Danian Nie *Department of Hematology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Yu Zhang *Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhiqiang Sun *Department of Hematology, Shenzhen Hospital of Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China.
Qing ZhangDepartment of Hematology, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Caixia WangDepartment of Hematology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Mujun XiongDepartment of Hematology, The First People's Hospital of Chenzhou, Chenzhou, China.
Zhiping FanDepartment of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Fen HuangDepartment of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Na XuDepartment of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Hui LiuDepartment of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Guopan YuDepartment of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Hongyu ZhangDepartment of Hematology, Shenzhen Hospital of Peking University, Shenzhen, China.
Pengcheng ShiDepartment of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jun XuDepartment of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Li XuanDepartment of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Ziwen GuoDepartment of Hematology, Zhongshan People's Hospital, Zhongshan, China.
Meiqing WuDepartment of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Lijie HanDepartment of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Yiying XiongDepartment of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Jing SunDepartment of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yu WangPeking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing, China. ywyw3172@sina.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1253-7465
Qifa LiuDepartment of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China. liuqifa628@163.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4015-3952
Nanfang Hospital · CNChenzhou First People's Hospital · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University · CNGuangdong Provincial People's Hospital · CNGuangxi Medical University · CNGuangzhou First People's Hospital · CNPeking University · CNPeking University Shenzhen Hospital · CNSouthern Medical University Shenzhen Hospital · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNThe Affiliated Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University · CNZhongshan People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to investigate outcomes of different post-remission treatment (PRT) choices based on dynamic measurable residual disease (MRD) by multiparameter flow cytometry in favorable-risk AML (FR-AML). Four hundred and three younger patients with FR-AML in first complete remission (CR1) were enrolled in this registry-based cohort study, including 173 who received chemotherapy (CMT), 92 autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT), and 138 allogeneic SCT (allo-SCT). The primary endpoint was the 5-year overall survival (OS). Subgroup analyses were performed based on dynamic MRD after the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd courses of chemotherapy. In subgroups of patients with negative MRD after 1 or 2 course of chemotherapy, comparable OS was observed among the CMT, auto-SCT, and allo-SCT groups (p = 0.340; p = 0.627, respectively). But CMT and auto-SCT had better graft-versus-host-disease-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) than allo-SCT in both subgroups. For patients with negative MRD after three courses of chemotherapy, allo-SCT had better disease-free-survival than CMT (p = 0.009). However, OS was comparable among the three groups (p = 0.656). For patients with persistently positive MRD after 3 courses of chemotherapy or recurrent MRD, allo-SCT had better OS than CMT and auto-SCT (p = 0.011; p = 0.029, respectively). Dynamic MRD might improve therapy stratification and optimize PRT selection for FR-AML in CR1.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAntineoplastic AgentsCohort StudiesDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm, ResidualPrognosisRemission InductionTransplantation, AutologousTransplantation, HomologousAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID34873148
PMCPMC8648754
OpenAlexW4226019776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.