Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34873061›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

Decoding the link of microbiome niches with homologous sequences enables accurately targeted protein structure prediction.

Pengshuo Yang, Wei Zheng, Kang Ning, Yang Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Petabase-Scale Homology Search for Structure Prediction.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Petascale Homology Search for Structure Prediction.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Using metagenomic data to boost protein structure prediction and discovery.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pengshuo YangKey Laboratory of Molecular Biophysics of the Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Bioinformatics and Molecular-imaging, Center of Artificial Intelligence Biology, Department of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China.
Wei ZhengDepartment of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.ORCID 0000-0002-2984-9003
Kang NingKey Laboratory of Molecular Biophysics of the Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Bioinformatics and Molecular-imaging, Center of Artificial Intelligence Biology, Department of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China; ningkang@hust.edu.cn zhng@umich.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3325-5387
Yang ZhangDepartment of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; ningkang@hust.edu.cn zhng@umich.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2739-1916

Funding

Structure-based functional annotation of microbial genomesR01AI134678 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Lydia Petra Freddolino, SCOTT J. HULTGREN · 2018 to 2026
$6.5M
Advanced approaches to protein structure predictionR35GM136422 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ZHANG, YANG · 2020 to 2021
$946k
High-Performance Computing Cluster for Biomedical ResearchS10OD026825 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ATHEY, BRIAN DAVID · 2020 to 2020
$600k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI134678NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM136422NIH HHS S10 OD026825
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Information derived from metagenome sequences through deep-learning techniques has significantly improved the accuracy of template free protein structure modeling. However, most of the deep learning-based modeling studies are based on blind sequence database searches and suffer from low efficiency in computational resource utilization and model construction, especially when the sequence library becomes prohibitively large. We proposed a MetaSource model built on 4.25 billion microbiome sequences from four major biomes (Gut, Lake, Soil, and Fermentor) to decode the inherent linkage of microbial niches with protein homologous families. Large-scale protein family folding experiments on 8,700 unknown Pfam families showed that a microbiome targeted approach with multiple sequence alignment constructed from individual MetaSource biomes requires more than threefold less computer memory and CPU (central processing unit) time but generates contact-map and three-dimensional structure models with a significantly higher accuracy, compared with that using combined metagenome datasets. These results demonstrate an avenue to bridge the gap between the rapidly increasing metagenome databases and the limited computing resources for efficient genome-wide database mining, which provides a useful bluebook to guide future microbiome sequence database and modeling development for high-accuracy protein structure and function prediction.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsComputational BiologyDatabases, ProteinDeep LearningEcosystemEvolution, MolecularHumansMetagenomeMicrobiotaNeural Networks, ComputerProtein ConformationProtein FoldingProteinsSequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, ProteinSequence HomologyProteinsdeep learningmicrobiomemultiple sequence alignmentsprotein homologous familiesprotein structure prediction

Identifiers

PMID34873061
PMCPMC8670487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.