Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34873045›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

Single-molecule sequencing reveals a large population of long cell-free DNA molecules in maternal plasma.

Stephanie C Y Yu, Peiyong Jiang, Wenlei Peng, Suk Hang Cheng, Y T Tommy Cheung, O Y Olivia Tse, Huimin Shang, Liona C Poon, Tak Y Leung, K C Allen Chan and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Stephanie C Y YuLi Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Peiyong JiangLi Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4523-3476
Wenlei PengLi Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Suk Hang ChengLi Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Y T Tommy CheungLi Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China.
O Y Olivia TseLi Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3932-3440
Huimin ShangLi Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Liona C PoonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3944-4130
Tak Y LeungDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China.
K C Allen ChanLi Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Rossa W K ChiuLi Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8207-9207
Y M Dennis LoLi Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China; loym@cuhk.edu.hk.ORCID 0000-0001-8746-0293

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the field of circulating cell-free DNA, most of the studies have focused on short DNA molecules (e.g., <500 bp). The existence of long cell-free DNA molecules has been poorly explored. In this study, we demonstrated that single-molecule real-time sequencing allowed us to detect and analyze a substantial proportion of long DNA molecules from both fetal and maternal sources in maternal plasma. Such molecules were beyond the size detection limits of short-read sequencing technologies. The proportions of long cell-free DNA molecules in maternal plasma over 500 bp were 15.5%, 19.8%, and 32.3% for the first, second, and third trimesters, respectively. The longest fetal-derived plasma DNA molecule observed was 23,635 bp. Long plasma DNA molecules demonstrated predominance of A or G 5' fragment ends. Pregnancies with preeclampsia demonstrated a reduction in long maternal plasma DNA molecules, reduced frequencies for selected 5' 4-mer end motifs ending with G or A, and increased frequencies for selected motifs ending with T or C. Finally, we have developed an approach that employs the analysis of methylation patterns of the series of CpG sites on a long DNA molecule for determining its tissue origin. This approach achieved an area under the curve of 0.88 in differentiating between fetal and maternal plasma DNA molecules, enabling the determination of maternal inheritance and recombination events in the fetal genome. This work opens up potential clinical utilities of long cell-free DNA analysis in maternal plasma including noninvasive prenatal testing of monogenic diseases and detection/monitoring of pregnancy-associated disorders such as preeclampsia.

Indexed as

AdultCell-Free Nucleic AcidsChromosomesComputer SimulationFemaleFetusHumansPregnancySingle Molecule ImagingCell-Free Nucleic Acidscell-free DNAepigeneticsmonogenic diseasesnoninvasive prenatal testingthird-generation sequencing

Identifiers

PMID34873045
PMCPMC8685924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.