Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34872967›Full record

ArticleBMJ open respiratory research2021

Reducing carbon footprint of inhalers: analysis of climate and clinical implications of different scenarios in five European countries.

Daniele Pernigotti, Carol Stonham, Sara Panigone, Federica Sandri, Rossella Ferri, Yasemin Unal, Nicolas Roche

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open respiratory research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Priority Setting in the Context of Planetary Healthcare.Applied health economics and health policy · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. [Community pharmacy and global warming].Farmaceuticos comunitarios · 2025
    Article
  19. [Inhaled Respiratory Therapy and Global Warming].Farmaceuticos comunitarios · 2025
    Observational
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniele PernigottiCEO, Aequilibria Srl-SB, Venezia, Italy.
Carol StonhamNHS Gloucestershire Clinical Commissioning Group, Brockworth, UK.
Sara PanigoneGlobal Marketing, Chiesi Farmaceutici SpA, Parma, Italy s.panigone@chiesi.com.
Federica SandriGlobal Marketing, Chiesi Farmaceutici SpA, Parma, Italy.
Rossella FerriCorporate Health Safety and Environment, Chiesi Farmaceutici SpA, Parma, Italy.
Yasemin UnalGlobal Medical Affairs, Chiesi Farmaceutici SpA, Parma, Italy.
Nicolas RochePneumologie, APHP Centre, Université de Paris, Paris, Île-de-France, France.
Chiesi (Italy) · ITUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInhaled therapies are key components of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) treatments. Although the use of pressurised metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs) accounts for <0.1% of global greenhouse gas emissions, their contribution to global warming has been debated and efforts are underway to reduce the carbon footprint of pMDIs. Our aim was to establish the extent to which different scenarios led to reductions in greenhouse gas emissions associated with inhaler use, and their clinical implications.

methodsWe conducted a series of scenario analyses using asthma and COPD inhaler usage data from 2019 to model carbon dioxide equivalent (CO

resultsTransition to low-GWP pMDIs and forced switching to DPI/SMIs (excluding SABA inhalers) would reduce annual CO

conclusionsWhile the absolute contribution of pMDIs to global warming is very small, substantial reductions in the carbon footprint of pMDIs can be achieved with transition to low-GWP propellant (HFA-152a) inhalers. This approach outperforms the substitution of pMDIs with DPI/SMIs while preserving patient access and choice, which are essential for optimising treatment and outcomes. These findings require confirmation in independent studies.

Indexed as

Carbon FootprintPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAdministration, InhalationHumansMetered Dose InhalersNebulizers and Vaporizersasthmaasthma guidelinesinhaler devices

Identifiers

PMID34872967
PMCPMC8650484
OpenAlexW4200296569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.