Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34872966›Full record

ArticleBMJ open respiratory research2021

Evaluation of medication changes following severe COVID-19 infection: a multicentre evaluation.

Pamela MacTavish, Joanne McPeake, Antoin Breslin, Ruth Forrest, Rakesh Kishore, Fiona MacGregor, Alison Oprey, Tara Quasim, Martin Shaw

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open respiratory research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Medication-related problems in critical care survivors: a systematic review.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pamela MacTavishGlasgow Royal Infirmary, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK.
Joanne McPeakeGlasgow Royal Infirmary, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK joanne.mcpeake@glasgow.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-8206-6801
Antoin BreslinSchool of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Ruth ForrestGlasgow Royal Infirmary, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK.
Rakesh KishoreGlasgow Royal Infirmary, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK.
Fiona MacGregorSchool of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Alison OpreyGlasgow Royal Infirmary, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK.
Tara QuasimGlasgow Royal Infirmary, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK.
Martin ShawGlasgow Royal Infirmary, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK.
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCritically ill patients often experience several transitions of care following critical illness. Research has explored the challenges which patients have with medication management across these transitions. It is unclear whether patients admitted to critical care due to COVID-19 will have similar challenges. The aim of this study was to explore medication management in critical care survivors following severe COVID-19.

methodsBetween 3 and 7 months post hospital discharge, patients who had been admitted to critical care due to severe COVID-19 were invited to an established recovery service. During the clinic consultation a medication review was performed by a pharmacist. This included medicines reconciliation, assessing the appropriateness of each of the prescribed medications and identification of medication changes. We also assessed changes to pain management in the discharge period.

resultsIn total, 78 patients had a full medication review available. Over 70% of patients were taking an increased dose of medicine or a new medicine at clinic. There was a significant overall increase in new medication during the clinic consultation, across different British National Formulary classifications (OR: 1.73 (95% CI: 1.28 to 2.34), p<0.001). Compared with pre critical care admission, there was a significant increase in the number of patients taking regular analgesia following severe COVID-19 infection (23 (29.5%) vs 39 (50%), p<0.001).

conclusionFollowing severe COVID-19, patients may require new or increasing doses of medicines. Ongoing review of these patients is crucial to ensure optimal outcomes.

Indexed as

COVID-19Critical CareHumansMedication ReviewPharmacistsSARS-CoV-2ARDSCOVID-19pulmonary rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID34872966
PMCPMC8650475
OpenAlexW3214368397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.