Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34872786›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology2022

Description of Surgical Technique and Oncologic and Functional Outcomes of the Precision Prostatectomy Procedure (IDEAL Stage 1-2b Study).

Akshay Sood, Wooju Jeong, Isaac Palma-Zamora, Firas Abdollah, Mohit Butaney, Nicholas Corsi, Hallie Wurst, Sohrab Arora, Naveen Kachroo, Oudai Hassan and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Akshay SoodVattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA; VCORE Vattikuti Urology Institute Center for Outcomes Research, Analytics and Evaluation, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA. Electronic address: akshaysood@outlook.com.
Wooju JeongVattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
Isaac Palma-ZamoraVattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
Firas AbdollahVattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA; VCORE Vattikuti Urology Institute Center for Outcomes Research, Analytics and Evaluation, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
Mohit ButaneyVattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
Nicholas CorsiVattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
Hallie WurstVattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
Sohrab AroraVattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
Naveen KachrooVattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
Oudai HassanDepartment of Pathology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
Nilesh GuptaDepartment of Pathology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
Michael A GorinUrology Associates and UPMC Western Maryland, Cumberland, MD, USA; Department of Urology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Mani MenonVattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA; VCORE Vattikuti Urology Institute Center for Outcomes Research, Analytics and Evaluation, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA; Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: mmenon1@hfhs.org.
Henry Ford Hospital · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe existing treatment options for men with intermediate- or high-volume low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) are associated with a substantial risk of over- or undertreatment. The development of risk-adjusted therapies is an unmet need for these patients.

objectiveTo describe our novel technique of precision prostatectomy, a form of surgical focal therapy that allows radical excision of the index PCa lesion along with >90% prostatic tissue extirpation while preserving the prostatic capsule and seminal vesicle/vas deferens complex on the side contralateral to the dominant cancer lesion, and to report on medium-term functional and oncologic outcomes in the first 88 consecutive men who underwent this procedure between December 2016 and January 2020. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsMen with (1) prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≤20 ng/ml, (2) clinical T stage ≤cT2, (3) a dominant unilateral lesion with Gleason ≤ 4 + 3 disease with any number or percentage of cores involved ipsilaterally on prostate biopsy, (4) no primary Gleason ≥4 lesion contralaterally, and (5) a preoperative Sexual Health Inventory of Men (SHIM) score of ≥17 (out of 25) with/without phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitor use who consented to undergo precision prostatectomy were included in this single-arm, single-center, IDEAL stage 2b prospective development study.

interventionRobotic precision prostatectomy. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The safety and urinary, sexual, and oncologic outcomes of the precision prostatectomy technique were studied. Descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to assess 12-mo urinary continence (0-1 pad), 12-mo sexual potency (SHIM score ≥17), 36-mo freedom from clinically significant PCa (grade group ≥2), secondary treatments, metastatic disease, and mortality. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: At study entry, the median age, PSA, and SHIM score were 60.0 yr (interquartile range [IQR] 54.2-65.9), 5.7 ng/ml (IQR 4.2-7.1), and 22 points (IQR 19-24), respectively. The median follow-up was 25 mo (IQR 14-38). At 12 mo, all patients were continent (0-1 pads), with 90.9% of patients using 0 pads. The median time to urinary continence was 1 mo (IQR 1-4). At 12 mo, 85% of all-comers and 90.2% of the preoperatively potent men were potent. The median time to sexual potency was 4 mo (IQR 4-12). From an oncologic standpoint, at 36 mo an estimated 93.4% of the patients were free from clinically significant residual PCa and 91.7% had not undergone any additional treatment. All patients were alive and free of metastatic disease at 36 mo.

conclusionsPrecision prostatectomy is technically safe and reproducible and offers excellent postoperative functional results. At 36-mo follow-up, the oncologic outcomes and secondary treatment rates appear to be superior to existing ablative focal therapy results. Pending long-term data, a risk-stratified surgical approach to PCa may avoid whole-gland therapy and preserve functional quality of life in men with localized PCa. PATIENT SUMMARY: Precision prostatectomy is a new form of focal therapy for intermediate-risk prostate cancer in which a 5-10-mm rim of prostate capsule is left on the opposite side of the gland to where the dominant cancer is located. The technique appears to be safe and efficacious and adds to the growing armamentarium of risk-adapted therapies for treatment of localized prostate cancer that avoid the adverse effects on urinary and erectile function of whole-gland treatments.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsRobotic Surgical ProceduresHumansMaleProspective StudiesProstatectomyProstate-Specific AntigenQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeProstate-Specific AntigenErectile dysfunctionFocal therapyMinimally invasive surgical proceduresProstate cancerProstatectomyRoboticsUrinary incontinence

Identifiers

PMID34872786
OpenAlexW4200073992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.