ArticleOne health outlook2021
A bolder One Health: expanding the moral circle to optimize health for all.
Article in One health outlook, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Defining One Health: Environment versus ecosystem.CABI one health · 2026Article
- Zoonoethics and Inclusive One Health Governance for H5N1 Panzootic: From Animal Culling to Co-responsibility.Public health ethics · 2026Article
- Ethical Challenges in Scientific Studies Within One Health.Current environmental health reports · 2026Review
- Advancing the One Health Framework in EU Plant Protection Product Regulation: Challenges and Opportunities.Journal of xenobiotics · 2025Article
- Uncovering associations between interest in One Health and pre-existing conditions and behaviours: Evidence from a UK survey.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024Article
- The development and validation of the One Health Community Assessment.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024Article
- Article
- One Health governance: theory, practice and ethics.Science in One Health · 2024Review
- Measuring the One Health impacts associated with creating access to veterinary care before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- What does One Health want? Feminist, posthuman, and anti-colonial possibilities.One health outlook · 2023Article
- Translating One Health knowledge across different institutional and political contexts in Europe.One health outlook · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One Health is a ground-breaking philosophy for improving health. It imaginatively challenges centuries-old assumptions about wellbeing and is now widely regarded as the 'best solution' for mitigating human health problems, including pandemic zoonotic diseases. One Health's success is imperative because without big changes to the status quo, great suffering and ill-health will follow. However, even in its more ambitious guises, One Health is not radical enough. For example, it has not embraced the emerging philosophical view that historical anthropocentrism is an unfounded ethical prejudice against other animals. This paper argues that One Health should be more imaginative and adventurous in its core philosophy and ultimately in its recommendations and activities. It must expand the circle of moral concern beyond a narrow focus on human interests to include nonhuman beings and the environment. On this bolder agenda, progressive ethical and practical thinking converge for the benefit of the planet and its diverse inhabitants-human and nonhuman.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.