Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34872604›Full record

ArticleJournal of ovarian research2021

The effect of different vitrification protocols on cell survival in human ovarian tissue: a pilot study.

J Marschalek, C Egarter, K Nouri, S Dekan, J Ott, M Frank, D Pietrowski

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ovarian research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03649087 (Testing of Vitrification Protocols for Ovarian Tissue Harvesting in Female to Male Transsexuals), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03649087 naunknown statusnot on this map

Testing of Vitrification Protocols for Ovarian Tissue Harvesting in Female to Male Transsexuals

TypeinterventionalSponsorMaximilian Franz, M.D.Ran2017 to 2018Enrolled10ConditionsOvary, AnomalyArmsVitrification
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J MarschalekDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
C EgarterDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
K NouriDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
S DekanClinical Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 230, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
J OttDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, 1090, Vienna, Austria. Johannes.ott@meduniwien.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2761-5262
M FrankDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
D PietrowskiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Medical University of Vienna · AT

Funding

Medical Scientific Fund of the Mayor of the City Vienna BM 17103
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVitrification has superseded the slow freezing method for cryopreservation of oocytes, embryos, and sperm, but there are as yet no standard protocols for its use in ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC). Published protocols diverge mainly with regard to the extent of supplementation of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) to the vitrification medium, and to the use of an open or closed vitrification system. We investigated the viability of cells after vitrification/warming, using ovarian tissue of transgender patients, by means of Fluorescence Activated Cells Sorting (FACS), and histomorphological analyses using a DMSO-containing (P1) and a DMSO-free protocol (P2) in an open or closed vitrification setting.

resultsTwelve ovarian samples were donated from female-to-male transgender patients: 6 were vitrified according to protocol 1, the other 6 according to protocol 2. The amount of viable cells was 90.1% (P1) and 88.4% (P2) before vitrification. After vitrification and subsequent warming, viable cells were reduced to 82.9% (P1, p = 0.093) and 72.4% (P2, p = 0.019). When comparing the closed and the open systems, the decline in cell viability from pre- to post-vitrification was significant only for the latter (p = 0.037). Histological examination reveals no significant differences with respect to degenerated follicles before or after vitrification.

conclusionThese results led us to conclude that a protocol containing DMSO results in a higher viability of ovarian cells than a protocol that uses ethylene glycol as cryoprotective agent in vitrification. The use of an open vitrification system led to significant decline in the rate of viable cells.

trial registrationNCT03649087 , retrospectively registered 28.08.2018.

Indexed as

OvaryVitrificationAdolescentAdultCell SurvivalCryopreservationDimethyl SulfoxideFemaleHumansPilot ProjectsYoung AdultDimethyl SulfoxideCell viabilityFertility preservationOvarian tissue cryopreservationTransgenderVitrification

Identifiers

PMID34872604
PMCPMC8650246
OpenAlexW4226063545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.