Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34872600›Full record

ArticleTrials2021

Evaluating the efficacy, impact, and feasibility of community-based house screening as a complementary malaria control intervention in southern Africa: a study protocol for a household randomized trial.

Onyango P Sangoro, Ulrike Fillinger, Kochelani Saili, Theresia Estomih Nkya, Rose Marubu, Freddie Masaninga, Sonia Casimiro Trigo, Casper Tarumbwa, Busiku Hamainza, Candrinho Baltazar and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. House modifications for preventing malaria.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 7 countries.

Onyango P SangoroInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, Nairobi, Kenya. psangoro@icipe.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8289-0171
Ulrike FillingerInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, Nairobi, Kenya.
Kochelani SailiInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, Nairobi, Kenya.
Theresia Estomih NkyaInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, Nairobi, Kenya.
Rose MarubuInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, Nairobi, Kenya.
Freddie MasaningaWorld Health Organization, Lusaka, Zambia.
Sonia Casimiro TrigoWorld Health Organization, Maputo, Mozambique.
Casper TarumbwaWorld Health Organization, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Busiku HamainzaNational Malaria Elimination Centre, Lusaka, Zambia.
Candrinho BaltazarNational Malaria Control Programme, Maputo, Mozambique.
Joseph MberikunasheNational Malaria Control Programme, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Brian ChisangaInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, Nairobi, Kenya.
Kassie MenaleInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, Nairobi, Kenya.
Emmanuel ChandaWorld Health Organization, Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo.
Clifford Maina MuteroInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, Nairobi, Kenya.
International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology · KENational Blood Service Zimbabwe · ZWNational Directorate of Geology · MZNational HIV/AIDS/STI/TB Council · ZMWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Africa · CGWorld Health Organization - Zambia · ZMWorld Health Organization - Zimbabwe · ZW

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConcerted effort to control malaria has had a substantial impact on the transmission of the disease in the past two decades. In areas where reduced malaria transmission is being sustained through insecticide-based vector control interventions, primarily long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS), non-insecticidal complementary tools will likely be needed to push towards malaria elimination. Once interruption in local disease transmission is achieved, insecticide-based measures can be scaled down gradually and eventually phased out, saving on costs of sustaining control programs and mitigating any unintended negative health and environmental impacts posed by insecticides. These non-insecticidal methods could eventually replace insecticidal methods of vector control. House screening, a non-insecticidal method, has a long history in malaria control, but is still not widely adopted in sub-Saharan Africa. This study aims to add to the evidence base for this intervention in low transmission settings by assessing the efficacy, impact, and feasibility of house screening in areas where LLINs are conventionally used for malaria control.

methodsA two-armed, household randomized clinical trial will be conducted in Mozambique, Zambia, and Zimbabwe to evaluate whether combined the use of house screens and LLINs affords better protection against clinical malaria in children between 6 months and 13 years compared to the sole use of LLINs. Eight hundred households will be enrolled in each study area, where 400 households will be randomly assigned the intervention, house screening, and LLINs while the control households will be provided with LLINs only. Clinical malaria incidence will be estimated by actively following up one child from each household for 6 months over the malaria transmission season. Cross-sectional parasite prevalence will be estimated by testing all participating children for malaria parasites at the beginning and end of each transmission season using rapid diagnostic tests. CDC light traps and pyrethrum spray catches (PSC) will be used to sample adult mosquitoes and evaluate the impact of house screening on indoor mosquito density, species distribution, and sporozoite rates. DISCUSSION: This study will contribute epidemiological data on the impact of house screening on malaria transmission and assess the feasibility of its implementation on a programmatic scale.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov PACTR202008524310568 . Registered on August 11, 2020.

Indexed as

Insecticide-Treated BednetsMalariaAdultAfrica, SouthernAnimalsChildCross-Sectional StudiesFeasibility StudiesHumansMosquito ControlMosquito VectorsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicHouse screeningIntegrated vector managementMalaria eliminationResidual malaria transmission

Identifiers

PMID34872600
PMCPMC8646012
OpenAlexW4226172537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.