Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34872559›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2021

Effects of prolonged incubation period and centralized quarantine on the COVID-19 outbreak in Shijiazhuang, China: a modeling study.

Wenlong Zhu, Mengxi Zhang, Jinhua Pan, Ye Yao, Weibing Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wenlong ZhuSchool of Public Health, Shanghai Institute of Infectious Disease and Biosecurity, Fudan University, 138 Yi Xue Yuan Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Mengxi ZhangSchool of Public Health, Shanghai Institute of Infectious Disease and Biosecurity, Fudan University, 138 Yi Xue Yuan Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Jinhua PanSchool of Public Health, Shanghai Institute of Infectious Disease and Biosecurity, Fudan University, 138 Yi Xue Yuan Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Ye YaoSchool of Public Health, Shanghai Institute of Infectious Disease and Biosecurity, Fudan University, 138 Yi Xue Yuan Road, Shanghai, 200032, China. yyao@fudan.edu.cn.
Weibing WangSchool of Public Health, Shanghai Institute of Infectious Disease and Biosecurity, Fudan University, 138 Yi Xue Yuan Road, Shanghai, 200032, China. wwb@fudan.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-4497-5251

Funding

Gates Foundation INV-006277national natural science foundation of china 82073612science and technology commission of shanghai municipality 20dz1200600Shanghai Municipal Health Commission GWV-10.1-XK16
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFrom 2 January to 14 February 2021, a local outbreak of COVID-19 occurred in Shijiazhuang, the capital city of Hebei Province, with a population of 10 million. We analyzed the characteristics of the local outbreak of COVID-19 in Shijiazhuang and evaluated the effects of serial interventions.

methodsPublicly available data, which included age, sex, date of diagnosis, and other patient information, were used to analyze the epidemiological characteristics of the COVID-19 outbreak in Shijiazhuang. The maximum likelihood method and Hamiltonian Monte Carlo method were used to estimate the serial interval and incubation period, respectively. The impact of incubation period and different interventions were simulated using a well-fitted SEIR

resultsFrom 2 January to 14 February 2021, there were 869 patients with symptomatic COVID-19 in Shijiazhuang, and most cases (89.6%) were confirmed before 20 January. Overall, 40.2% of the cases were male, 16.3% were aged 0 to 19 years, and 21.9% were initially diagnosed as asymptomatic but then became symptomatic. The estimated incubation period was 11.6 days (95% CI 10.6, 12.7 days) and the estimated serial interval was 6.6 days (0.025

conclusionsIncubation period was longer than serial interval suggested that more secondary transmission may occur before symptoms onset. The long incubation period made it necessary to extend the isolation period to control the outbreak. Timely contact tracing and implementation of a centralized quarantine quickly contained this epidemic in Shijiazhuang. Large-scale nucleic acid testing also helped to identify cases and reduce virus transmission.

Indexed as

COVID-19Infectious Disease Incubation PeriodQuarantineAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolChinaDisease OutbreaksFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleCOVID-19EpidemiologyIncubation periodNon-pharmaceutical interventionSEIR model

Identifiers

PMID34872559
PMCPMC8648499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.