ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2021
Patients' views of shared decision making in inflammatory bowel disease: a survey in China.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient treatment engagement scale (PTES) for inflammatory bowel disease: exploring background factors.BMC research notes · 2026Article
- Patient participation and its determinants based on the Social Ecological Model: a cross-sectional study in North China.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Perceptions and Attitudes Toward Life-Sustaining Treatment Communication: A Comparison Between Physicians and Surrogates.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Examining cancer patient preferences during three stages of decision making and family involvement: a multicenter survey study in China.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Factors Influencing Decision-Making Preferences Among Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study in China.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Article
- Commentary on: "Different perceptions on the diagnosis and treatment of Crohn's disease between patients and gastroenterologists: a multicenter retrospective study".Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Status quo of advanced cancer patients participating in shared decision-making in China: a mixed study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023Article
- Medical consultation in ulcerative colitis: Key elements for improvement.World journal of gastroenterology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecently, decision-making process has become increasingly complex. But there is limited information on Chinese patients' views of shared decision making (SDM) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). This questionnaire investigation aimed to understand Chinese patients' perspectives and expectations of SDM in IBD and analyze the possible factors that influence their views.
methodsAn online survey was conducted from July 19th to 24th, 2020. A total of 1118 patients completed the survey.
resultsOne-third of patients were dissatisfied with the current decision-making model, and the satisfaction of inpatients was lower than that of outpatients. 84% of patients preferred to participate in SDM, who were young and had a high education level, high income, commercial insurance, strong learning ability and knowledge of SDM. Most of those who did not want to participate (72%) were worried about the cost. The kind of medicine (948, 84.8%), surgical indications (505, 45.2%) and operation methods (482, 43.1%) were the topics that patients thought most require SDM. Side effects of medicine (837, 74.9%), costs of therapy (675, 60.4%), and surgical risks (563, 50.4%) were considered to be the most influential factors for SDM. 52.7% of all patients hoped experts in different disciplines would participate in SDM. The most desirable amount of time for discussion was 30 to 60 min (562/1118, 50.3%), that were associated with the cost of SDM.
conclusionWe can meet the needs of patients by reducing costs and strengthening online patient education and exploring a model suitable for Chinese IBD patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.