Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34872423›Full record

ArticleNursing ethics2022

Viewing the image? Ultrasound examination during abortion preparations, ethical challenges.

Marianne Kjelsvik, Ragnhild Jt Sekse, Elin M Aasen, Eva Gjengedal

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing ethics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marianne KjelsvikDepartment of Health Sciences in Aalesund, 8018Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Aalesund, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5818-8382
Ragnhild Jt SekseFaculty of Health Studies, 155312VID Specialized University, Bergen, Norway; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 60498Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Elin M AasenDepartment of Health Sciences in Aalesund, 8018Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Aalesund, Norway.
Eva GjengedalDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, 60518University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Norwegian University of Science and Technology · NOHaukeland University Hospital · NOUniversity of Bergen · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During preparation for early abortion in Norway, an ultrasound examination is usually performed to determine gestation and viability. This article aims to provide a deeper understanding of women's and health care personnel's (HCP) experiences with ultrasound viewing during abortion preparation in the first trimester. Qualitative in-depth interviews with women who had been prepared for early abortion and focus group interviews with HCP from gynaecological units were carried out. A hermeneutic-phenomenological analysis, inspired by van Manen, was chosen. Thirteen women who were pregnant and considering abortion in their first trimester and 20 HCP, namely, 19 registered nurses and one medical doctor, were recruited from gynaecological units at six hospitals. The study was approved by the ethics committee (2014/1276). The essential meaning structure of 'autonomy under pressure' consisted of two themes that expressed the different experiences of both the women and the HCP, namely, expectations versus precautions and choice versus protection. The women and HCP expressed different attitudes before the consultation that affected their experiences of the ultrasound examination. While the women had expectations of a clarification based on their choice to either see or not see the ultrasound image, HCP seemed to be more concerned with predetermined rules that they believed would protect the women. Consequently, the basis for dialogue was not optimal, and women's autonomy was under pressure. Health care personnel are ethically challenged during preabortion ultrasound examinations. Meeting the individual woman's needs and respecting her autonomy during preparation for abortion requires sensitivity, involvement, and dialogue skills by health personnel. According to the woman's desire to be informed about the possibility of viewing the image during the abortion preparations, a dialogue that is focused in this direction should arise before the examination.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedFemaleFocus GroupsHealth PersonnelHumansMoralsPregnancyUltrasonographydecision-makingEarly abortionethics of carefour principles approachinduced abortionmoral sensitivitypregnancyqualitativeultrasoundwomen’s reproductive health

Identifiers

PMID34872423
PMCPMC8958634
OpenAlexW4200390356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.