Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34872409›Full record

ArticleNursing ethics2022

Caregiver decision-making concerning involuntary treatment in dementia care at home.

Vincent Ra Moermans, Angela Mhj Mengelers, Michel Hc Bleijlevens, Hilde Verbeek, Bernadette Dierckx de Casterle, Koen Milisen, Elizabeth Capezuti, Jan Ph Hamers

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing ethics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Developing a Set of Key Principles for Care Planning Within Older Adult Care Homes: A Modified Delphi Survey.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Decision-Making concerning Involuntary Oral Care for Older Individuals with Dementia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Vincent Ra MoermansMaastricht University, The Netherlands; White Yellow Cross Limburg, Belgium; Living Lab in Ageing and Long-Term Care, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6667-3238
Angela Mhj Mengelers
Michel Hc Bleijlevens
Hilde VerbeekMaastricht University, The Netherlands; Living Lab in Ageing and Long-Term Care, The Netherlands.
Bernadette Dierckx de CasterleORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1887-8407
Koen MilisenKU Leuven, Belgium; University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium.
Elizabeth CapezutiHunter College and City University of New York, USA.
Jan Ph HamersMaastricht University, The Netherlands; Living Lab in Ageing and Long-Term Care, The Netherlands.
Maastricht University · NLCity University of New York · USKU Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDementia care at home often involves decisions in which the caregiver must weigh safety concerns with respect for autonomy. These dilemmas can lead to situations where caregivers provide care against the will of persons living with dementia, referred to as involuntary treatment. To prevent this, insight is needed into how family caregivers of persons living with dementia deal with care situations that can lead to involuntary treatment.

objectiveTo identify and describe family caregivers' experiences regarding care decisions for situations that can lead to involuntary treatment use in persons living with dementia at home. RESEARCH

designA qualitative descriptive interview design. Data were analysed using the Qualitative Analysis Guide of Leuven. PARTICIPANTS AND RESEARCH CONTEXT: A total of 10 family caregivers providing care for 13 persons living with dementia participated in in-depth semi-structured interviews. Participants were recruited by registered nurses via purposive sampling. ETHICAL CONSIDERATION: The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University Hospitals Leuven and the Medical Ethical Test Committee Zuyderland.

findingsFamily caregivers experience the decision-making process concerning care dilemmas that can lead to involuntary treatment as complicated, stressful and exhausting. Although they consider safety and autonomy as important values, they struggle with finding the right balance between them. Due to the progressive and unpredictable nature of dementia, they are constantly seeking solutions while they adapt to new situations. Family caregivers feel responsible and experience social pressure for the safety of persons living with dementia. They may be blamed if something adverse happens to the persons living with dementia, which increases an already stressful situation. Their experience is influenced by characteristics of the care triad (persons living with dementia, professional and family caregivers) such as practical and emotional support, knowledge, and previous experiences. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionTo prevent involuntary treatment, professionals need to proactively inform family caregivers, and they need to support each other in dealing with complex care situations.

Indexed as

DementiaInvoluntary TreatmentCaregiversHumansQualitative ResearchAutonomyethics and dementia carefamily caregivershome careinvoluntary treatmentsafety

Identifiers

PMID34872409
PMCPMC8958636
OpenAlexW4200527215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.